The crucial role of cash – how to play it within your investment strategy

*This content is brought to you by PSG Asset Management. #BiggerPictureThinkers

In our article last week by Shaun le Roux, ‘The benefits of a flexible investment approach,’ we discussed cash as a useful asset class. This week we’d like to elaborate on cash.

By Kevin Cousins*

Many investors view cash positions in a unit trust as a drag on performance. Asset consultants typically advise investors to minimise cash holdings in multi-asset mandates whenever possible, citing the low long-term average returns achieved by cash relative to the other asset classes.

Photo credit: epSos.de / Foter / CC BY

We have at times had significant cash holdings in even our higher risk multi-asset funds. This is not the result of a top-down macro forecast, but due to a scarcity of investment opportunities that meet our criteria in the riskier asset classes. We are willing to hold cash because it effectively expands our opportunity set from risk assets at today’s prices to the prices that will become available on risk assets in the future. Viewed like this, cash plays a crucial long-term role in our portfolios.

Conventional wisdom: minimise cash to maximise returns

It is clear cash has the lowest long-term average returns of all the asset classes. The table shows that over the past 16 years, South African equities have provided an average 6% per annum additional performance compared to cash. The simplistic response is to conclude that any mandate with a long-term investment horizon should aim to minimise its cash holdings and have a larger holding in risk assets (in this example equities and bonds).

South Africa: annualised total returns 2000 to 2016

Asset class Nominal return Real return
Cash 8.0% 2.2%
Equities 14.0% 8.2%
Bonds 10.9% 5.1%

Source: Credit Suisse (Reference 1)

In fact, a typical asset allocation approach is to use the long-term average returns for each asset class and an estimate of risk based on the historical volatility of return. Holdings in each asset class are then optimised to produce the highest risk-adjusted return for the portfolio. This process – which is widely used to determine asset allocation in multi-asset mandates – is almost guaranteed to restrict cash holdings to the minimum.

A key assumption underlying the return-optimised asset allocation process is that the future returns for each asset class will be similar to their historic long-term averages. This assumption is, however, deeply flawed. It shows little regard for the importance of entry multiples or yields in determining long-term returns, particularly for equities. Future long-term returns can differ substantially from long-term average returns.

We illustrate this using FTSE/JSE All Share Index data from 1995 onwards. We compare the rating of the index initially with the subsequent 5-year total returns. The returns are expressed relative to the average for the whole period.

Impact of initial rating on subsequent 5-year annualised total equity returns

Index rating at entry

(Price/Sales Ratio)

<1.0x 1.0–1.2x 1.2-1.4x 1.4-1.6x 1.6-1.8x >1.8x
5-year subsequent excess annualised total returns 11% 4% 0% -1% -5% -8%

Source: Bloomberg. FTSE/JSE All Share Index, 5-year subsequent total returns relative to the average for the whole period, September 1995 to February 2012, rolled monthly. The rating was determined using the price-to-sales ratio. This ratio is less distorted by the effects of loss making companies and the margin fluctuations of the more cyclical index components than a price-to-earnings ratio.

The table above shows that if we invest in equities at a time when they are relatively expensive (a price to sales ratio greater than 1.6x), returns are unlikely to significantly exceed those achieved by cash and will probably not compensate investors for the additional risk incurred. By contrast, investments in equities when the index is relatively cheap (a price to sales ratio of less than 1.2x) are likely deliver much stronger returns than the average. Historically, there is a strong link between the prevailing valuation and subsequent long-term equity returns that the asset allocation optimisation model ignores.

PSG Asset Management’s bottom-up research-driven process

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

While the above exercise does a good job of exposing a serious flaw in the asset allocation processes used by many managers of multi-asset mandates, we must emphasize that at PSG we do not use top down or macro-economic forecasts to determine our positioning.

The foundation of our investment process is bottom-up, or company-specific research. Our equity team searches for companies that meet our ‘3 Ms’ criteria:

  • a sound economic moat;
  • management with a proven track record and an alignment of interests;
  • and, most importantly, the stock must trade at a sufficient discount to our estimate of its intrinsic value to provide a margin of safety for our investment.

While it is relatively easy to find shares with attractive economic characteristics and sound management, they are seldom available at reasonable prices. Thus, the requirement to invest with a margin of safety can often restrict our opportunity set.

When we find many shares that meet our ‘3 Ms’ criteria, our multi-asset funds tend to hold very high exposure to equities. However, in periods when we find fewer shares that are available at a price that provides a margin of safety, we far prefer to accumulate cash rather than overpay. Hence our asset allocation is effectively driven by our bottom-up stock selection process, in contrast to the majority of our peers who typically are bound by a tight target range.

The crucial role of cash in our process

A cornerstone of our investment philosophy is having the patience and discipline to wait for attractive prices before investing. This is often not without a temporary cost, as peer group funds with higher equity weightings may outperform in the short term. However, cash plays a crucial long-term role in our portfolios, in that it effectively expands our opportunity set from the prices available on risk assets today to the prices that will become available in the future. By providing this inter-temporal choice (Reference 2), cash in fact becomes a very valuable holding, enabling us to take full advantage of future periods of investor pessimism (or even panic). This would not be possible with an investment process that prevented substantial cash accumulation by tightly restricting us to pre-determined asset allocations.

  • Kevin Cousins, Fund manager, PSG Asset Management
Visited 35 times, 1 visit(s) today