Zuma’s 9/12 over-reach – obvious to all, except those in his KZN heartland

During my roadshow last week it was noticeable how deeply South Africa is divided right now. In Gauteng, the Western Cape and even Mpumalanga, disgust at growing corruption and blatant cronyism of the Zuma Administration is palpable. People talk openly about ejecting a deeply complicit President as the first step to returning to promises embedded in one of the finest Constitutions on earth. But in Jacob Zuma’s KZN heartland, it is even more than business as usual. For instance, in capital Pietermaritzburg, honest public servants threatening the network of patronage are under siege. Municipal manager Mxolisi Nkosi’s suspension was followed last week by a similar “improper and irrational” action against the city’s chief internal auditor Petrus Mahlaba. He was sent home by the two people – acting municipal manager Boniwe Zulu and deputy Ray Ncgobo – whose names are front and centre in the auditor’s corruption investigations. Neither of them, incidentally, actually has the legal right to suspend Mahlaba – but they did so anyway. Zuma’s acolytes, especially in KZN, are lashing out at all critics, even accusing the banks of having acted in concert against the recently departed Guptas. They accuse those challenging the status quo as railing against “democracy”. But the tide has turned. Those abusing the system are sure to eventually take a step too far. As the piece below suggests Zuma did on 9 December, 9/12, when he spectacularly over-reached. – Alec Hogg

By Liesl Peyper

Cape Town – When President Jacob Zuma fired Nhlanhla Nene as finance minister it changed the course of history for him and most probably for South Africa too, according to political analyst Aubrey Matshiqi.

Speaking at an investment roadshow hosted by Glacier by Sanlam on Monday morning, Matshiqi said Zuma had more power on the day before he dismissed Nene than he has at present.

South African President Jacob Zuma addresses supporters of his ruling African National Congress (ANC), at a rally to launch the ANC's local government election manifesto in Port Elizabeth, April 16, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Hutchings
South African President Jacob Zuma addresses supporters of his ruling African National Congress (ANC), at a rally to launch the ANC’s local government election manifesto in Port Elizabeth, April 16, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Hutchings

“Days after December the ninth, Zuma breathed life into Pravin Gordhan (who at that stage was a minister of local government) just as Jesus breathed life into Lazarus,” said Matshiqi.

On December 9 2015 Zuma replaced former finance minister Nhlanhla Nene with little-known ANC backbencher Des van Rooyen. The rand crashed through the R15/$ level when the news broke and continued on a downward spiral for six consecutive days.

This compelled Zuma to reappoint former finance minister Pravin Gordhan and move Van Rooyen to the local government portfolio.

Read also: Ramaphosa star rising, tipped to succeed Zuma with Nkosazana now dead duck

“What people in power must remember is that one decision can change the course of history – just like the course of history changed for former president Thabo Mbeki when he fired Zuma in June 2005 from his position as deputy president of the country,” Matshiqi said.

But although more and more people – including some ANC stalwarts – are demanding that Zuma step down, it will not be so easy to get rid of him, Matshiqi said.

“Zuma hasn’t lost control over the ANC like Thabo Mbeki. Zuma is still the sitting president of the ANC, which means the national executive committee of the ANC cannot recall him. The ANC needs to call a special conference to do that.”

Matshiqi added that Zuma did not make the mistake of losing control over the ANC like Mbeki. On the contrary, he made sure that he remains in control of the security establishments, such as the National Prosecuting Authority.

Read also: Beneficiaries of patronage? For Zuma’s apologists, ignorance is no excuse.

He did point out though that Zuma’s fortunes may change after the local government elections on August 3. “If the ANC perceives Zuma to be a liability, they will act.

“When people inside the ANC are beginning to think he’s a liability and he has become a threat to their self-interest and their ability to eat, they’ll recall them. Until that point, nothing will happen to him.”

Matshiqi is of the view that Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa would not be the first choice to succeed Zuma. The ANC will probably vote for Nkosasana Dlamini-Zuma (president of the African Union) to make sure the patronage networks remain intact. – Fin24

Source: http://www.fin24.com/Economy/912-the-day-that-changed-zumas-fate-analyst-20160418

Visited 91 times, 1 visit(s) today