Dishonest Guptas face fresh allegation of manipulating Oakbay share price

JOHANNESBURG — It never rains; it pours – or so the saying goes. After ‘gracing’ the front page today of the Financial Times for their devious business behaviour, the Guptas are now facing another bombshell allegation that they manipulated the Oakbay share price upon its JSE listing. Bloomberg has pieced emails together showing how the corrupt Indian immigrant family literally gave a Singapore company $1m in order to buy Oakbay shares and then sell them at a higher price. The implications are that Oakbay’s valuation shot up to unrealistic levels and, critically, gave the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) a false perception of the company’s value. It’s another shocking revelation, and with a Singapore firm now roped in, the global contagion continues. Local regulators are said to be on the case. Let’s hope swift punishment follows. – Gareth van Zyl

Read more: Stock market artist fined R100k for giving Gupta the middle finger in masterful Oakbay trades2. BRILLIANT!

Guptas: Things fall apart. More of Zapiro’s brilliant work available at

By Renee Bonorchis

(Bloomberg) — The Gupta family inflated the share price of a company it controlled on its Johannesburg Stock Exchange debut by lending money to a Singapore firm to be used to trade the equities. That came ahead of plans to raise funds for a uranium mine.

Read more: Peter Hain’s “smoking gun” – provides bank accounts detailing how Guptas took billions from SA

The Guptas, who are embroiled in a corruption scandal linked to South African President Jacob Zuma, agreed to loan $1 million from bank accounts in Dubai to Unlimited Electronics & Computers in Singapore in November 2014. That same month, UEC transferred $928,146 to the Guptas’ Oakbay Resources and Energy Ltd. and the two companies had a contract entitling UEC to 18.5 million Oakbay shares at 10 rand a share, according to a Nov. 20 communication that was one of a trove of emails seen by Bloomberg.

Read more: BACKSTORY: Zupta protester James Gubb on THAT R100k fine: ‘I was an easy target’

The 2.31 percent stake in Oakbay was worth about 185 million rand ($13 million). Oakbay employee Ronica Ragavan told UEC director Kamran Gani by email on Nov. 27, 2014, a day before Oakbay listed, to instruct his brokers to sell 10,000 shares for 10.05 rand each and another 10,000 shares for 10.08 rand before Dec. 5.

The 20,000 shares that traded on the Oakbay debut set the share price at 10.08 rand, giving the company a market value of more than 8 billion rand. That was more than 48 times its full-year revenue. Most Johannesburg-based mining companies have revenue that exceeds their market value.

The volume of shares that traded on Oakbay’s listing day was the highest ever recorded for the stock. It set an indicative price for future fund raising and determined how much equity would be needed to pay off a loan from South African state-development institution, the Industrial Development Corp.

Post-Apartheid Scandal

“Trade is supposed to be an honest deal, setting an honest price,” Clinton van Loggerenberg, a director at law firm ENSafrica said by phone. “In principal it does sound like something that should be investigated further.”

The communication between Ragavan and UEC and subsequent stock trading is another example of how the Gupta family has become involved in allegations of corruption that have become the biggest post-apartheid scandal in South Africa. The president, his son, state firms and international companies including McKinsey & Co. Inc., KPMG LLP and SAP SE have been implicated in dealings with the Guptas or companies linked to them. The Guptas have been accused of interfering with Cabinet appointments and using political connections to win favorable contracts from state companies.

Zuma, his son Duduzane and the Guptas have denied wrongdoing. KPMG said some of its senior staff in South Africa including the local head have quit after an internal probe and it said it will give the money it made from dealing with the family to charity. SAP has reported the conduct of some its employees to U.S. regulators and McKinsey is reviewing its practices and will suspend work with state-owned companies in the country.

Uranium Mine

In its pre-listing statement published on Nov. 21, 2014, Oakbay said that in the 12 months following the listing it would need to raise at least 800 million rand from investors to start production at its uranium mine and the Guptas’ closely held investment company was willing to reduce its shareholding in the publicly traded company.

Having loaned Oakbay 250 million rand in 2010 to help it develop its business the Industrial Development Corp. agreed to have its investment converted to shares at a 10 percent discount when Oakbay began trading. The IDC said UEC’s investment helped reassure it about the value of the company.

Read also: Stock market artist fined R100k for giving Gupta the middle finger in masterful Oakbay trades. BRILLIANT!

“The IDC asked for and was given an assurance that UEC was not a related party to any of the shareholders of Oakbay at the time,” it said in a statement to Bloomberg.

Oakbay Resources delisted this year after directors resigned and its sponsor and transfer secretaries quit amid press reports about the relationship between the Guptas and Zuma.

‘Think Big’

Gani, who was visited by Bloomberg at his 5th floor offices in an industrial part of Singapore on Oct. 19, where he sat beneath a framed dollar bill and the words “Think Big,” said he didn’t have time to respond to questions and might comment at a later date. Gary Naidoo, a spokesman for the Gupta family, didn’t respond to emails or messages left on his mobile phone. Ragavan referred questions to Naidoo.

Read more: This is war! Zuma, Gupta bots target UK enemy #1: Peter Hain, campaigner for SA justice

Oakbay’s audits from KPMG in South Africa helped convince Sasfin Holdings Ltd. to manage its listing as its sponsor, a stock exchange requirement, a person familiar with the situation said. The emails show Oakbay used its bank account with Barclays Africa Group Ltd.’s Absa unit to receive the money from UEC.

KPMG and Sasfin said they found nothing concerning when they assessed Oakbay. Absa, which later closed Oakbay’s accounts, didn’t comment on the UEC transfers when sent queries by Bloomberg, citing client confidentiality. The IDC said it’s now considering its legal options because it thought UEC was a public investor in Oakbay and not linked to the Guptas.

This year “the JSE market regulation division decided to provide details of the trading just after the listing to the Directorate of Market Abuse for further investigation,” said Nicky Newton-King, chief executive officer of the JSE. She was referring to a unit of the Financial Services Board, which regulates part of the financial services industry.

“A preliminary investigation was registered and is currently in progress,” the FSB said.