🔒 Hong Kong tech stocks drop sharply on Beijing action – With insights from The Wall Street Journal

The monthly webinar updating the BizNews Share portfolio, at noon today, has been well timed. When we acquire positions, the average holding period for stocks is “forever” – except when fundamentals change. Should that happen, it’s best to act speedily. I’m guilty of not doing so. Months ago, it was already clear there was a change in Beijing’s approach to towards its major companies. This is a critical issue for South African investors given the price of the JSE’s dominant stocks (Naspers/Prosus) are based on the performance of their holding in Chinese internet group Tencent. This morning’s piece below from our partners at The Wall Street Journal, strips away the veneer to show Beijing’s true intentions. After dropping 7.7% yesterday, Tencent is leading Hong Kong tech stocks still lower this morning, falling another 5%. – Alec Hogg

Use Spotify? Access BizNews podcasts here.

Use Apple Podcasts? Access BizNews podcasts here.
___STEADY_PAYWALL___


China Tech Stocks Slump as Regulators Apply Fresh Pressure

Selloff sends Hong Kong’s flagship tech index sharply lower

Updated July 26, 2021 11:15 am ET

A new onslaught of regulatory actions in China rattled investors Monday, hammering big tech stocks and fueling a fresh crash in the shares of companies that organize online and in-person tutoring for Chinese schoolchildren.

The selloff knocked companies such as Tencent Holdings Ltd. TCEHY -10.03% , which dropped 7.7%. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Tech index tumbled 6.6%, the worst performance for the benchmark since it launched almost exactly a year ago. And education stocks dived, with New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. EDU -33.79% crashing 47% in Hong Kong trading, building on a steep fall in the previous session.

Over the weekend, state media announced a severe curtailing of after-school tutoring was in the works, while regulators ordered Tencent to give up some exclusive music-licensing rights.

Then on Monday, authorities issued guidelines on how to treat food-delivery drivers, helping drive a 14% plunge in the stock of Meituan, 3690 -13.24% one of a newer breed of Chinese tech platforms. Meanwhile, China’s main technology-sector regulator also ordered the country’s internet giants to fix certain anticompetitive practices and data security threats.

China already has undertaken a monthslong campaign to rein in big tech, spanning issues such as data security, monopolistic behavior and financial stability. The latest moves, covering both tutoring and technology, made clear that Beijing is willing to inflict substantial market pain to meet its social and regulatory goals.

“The whole market is jittery about where China’s regulations and crackdowns are headed. Instead of waiting to find out, a lot of investors are just selling out of their position,” said Justin Tang, the head of Asian research at United First Partners.

Jack Ma’s financial-technology giant, Ant Group Co., was forced to halt a blockbuster share sale in November and has since been working on a state-ordered overhaul that will turn it into a heavily regulated and more limited financial holding company. Sister company Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. received a record antitrust fine a few months later, and other tech companies were ordered to scrutinize their own behavior and to submit plans to fix any shortcomings. More recently, regulators took aim at ride-hailing giant Didi Global Inc. days after it went public in New York.

China’s leaders are—at least in part—responding to widely held concerns about behavior in industries that have grown at breakneck speed, often with limited regulatory oversight. In some cases, there is a potential spillover to wider social issues. For example, spiraling educational costs are seen as one factor deterring many families from having more children.

But some observers say President Xi Jinping’s eagerness to exert tighter control over the country and the economy also is key.

“National security considerations trump everything else,” including growth, in Mr. Xi’s administration, said Diana Choyleva, chief economist at Enodo Economics in London.

With the recent slew of actions, business is being brought to heel by the Chinese government and the Communist Party, said George Magnus, an economist who is a research associate at Oxford University’s China Centre.

“It’s about systemically trying to establish the authority of the state, or of the party, over the private sector—which effectively has been at the cutting edge of China’s economic eruption for the last 20 or 30 years,” he said. “To the extent it stifles the private sector, and private-sector innovation, I think it will cost China in years to come.”

The new tutoring rules, published by state media, would force tutoring services teaching school subjects to students through compulsory years of education to be run as not-for-profit operations. They also would introduce fee standards, ban the companies from capital raising and foreign ownership and forbid teaching during weekends and public or school holidays.

While regulators aren’t concerned about inflicting losses on investors in educational stocks, the rules aim primarily to restore order to the sector, given high fees and other issues, said Hong Hao, chief strategist at Chinese state-owned bank BoCom International.

“The purpose is to ensure that kids get proper education,” he said. “It’s not to wipe out the entire market and destroy everyone’s portfolios.”

He said authorities could later turn their focus to other areas that they consider out of control, such as healthcare and property. “These sectors are areas where the most painful reforms have to be done,” he said.

A previous clampdown on peer-to-peer lending effectively shut down the fintech experiment, though some companies survived by diversifying into other business lines. Late last year a top banking regulator said China’s peer-to-peer industry had been “zeroed out.”

Monday’s selloff left the Hang Seng Tech Index at 6790.96—not far from its first-day close of July 27, 2020, when it ended at 6774.78. The gauge, run by Hang Seng Indexes Co., was meant to complement efforts by the operator of Hong Kong’s stock exchange to attract more tech listings and investment. But it has sold off since peaking in mid-February, trailing tech-heavy U.S. benchmarks.

Some analysts and investors said they were hopeful that China’s rolling crackdowns would improve the industries they target and weren’t meant to hobble national champions or to prevent companies from being inventive.

“The tightening of regulation should benefit the leading players,” said Jessica Tea, a senior investment specialist for Asia equities at BNP Paribas Asset Management. She drew parallels between the current situation in education and an earlier shake-up of online gaming.

Write to Quentin Webb at [email protected], Joanne Chiu at [email protected] and Chong Koh Ping at [email protected]

Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the July 27, 2021, print edition as ‘Beijing’s Regulatory Blitz Spurs A Selloff.’

GoHighLevel
gohighlevel gohighlevel login gohighlevel pricing gohighlevel crm gohighlevel api gohighlevel support gohighlevel review gohighlevel logo what is gohighlevel gohighlevel affiliate gohighlevel integrations gohighlevel features gohighlevel app gohighlevel reviews gohighlevel training gohighlevel snapshots gohighlevel zapier app gohighlevel gohighlevel alternatives gohighlevel pricegohighlevel pricing guidegohighlevel api gohighlevel officialgohighlevel plansgohighlevel Funnelsgohighlevel Free Trialgohighlevel SAASgohighlevel Websitesgohighlevel Experts