🔒 Boardroom Talk: Neels’s timely reminder why M&R should never make it into the BizNews portfolio.

Am looking forward to sharing the monthly portfolio update at noon today – not just because it comes from Cape Town where I’m ensconced at the Latitude ahead of tomorrow’s mid-term Budget. I’ll be in lock-up from 6am tomorrow, putting together the important stuff for publication on BizNews.com at 2pm. At 7pm tomorrow evening I’ll host an interactive traditional post-Budget webinar sharing the info you need to know. It’s open to all but you do need to sign up beforehand. Click here to register.

Back to the BizNews share portfolio which was significantly restructured last month. Some changes have already worked out well. One, Telkom, not so, after MTN pulled out of a possible takeover. It could have been worse as ahead of the restructure, I was tempted to add Murray & Roberts after its share price had fallen by half despite an upbeat outlook.

Even after falling further – now a third of August’s price – M&R is not for us. I’m indebted to community member Neels Viljoen’s pointer to Benjamin Graham’s classic definition of an investable stock: “one which, on thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and a satisfactory return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.”

___STEADY_PAYWALL___

Neels, who has plenty of experience in the sector, reckons it is impossible for investors to make anything other than an educated guess whether projects in M&R’s massive order book will make or lose money. A fact the stock market was reminded of last Monday when M&R disclosed serious problems on its mega projects in Texas and Western Australia.

Given such uncertainty, Neels writes, “it is thus impossible to calculate the intrinsic value with any degree of certainty. Luck plays a bigger role.” Ergo M&R shares are speculative, not investable. A timely reminder for all of us. Look forward to seeing you in the webinar at noon. If you haven’t yet registered, here’s the link to sign-up for this Premium-only event.

More for you to read today: 


Bernard Mostert on buying Jooste’s R75m mortgage; Steinheist and media sensationalism
Bernard Mostert shines his searchlight on the furore around the R75.4m mortgage loan on Markus Jooste’s property assets registered in the name of his mentor and business partner Braam van Huyssteen’s trust. He explains how the mortgage came into the trust’s possession – and implications of last week’s preservation order on Jooste’s assets, including his Hermanus home, by the SA Reserve Bank. Mostert also voices concerns over media sensationalism and offers his thoughts on the blockbuster documentary Steinheist in which he featured prominently. He spoke to Alec Hogg of BizNews.

NB FOR YOUR WALL STREET JOURNAL ACCESS…

As a Premium subscriber you are entitled to full membership of wsj.com (normal price $29 a month). Be sure to action your access through the Premium link on the BizNews website. Because of The Wall Street Journal’s credential requirements, be sure to create a password which has at least 8 characters and includes at least one letter and one number – NB it MAY NOT contain any special characters (ie #, !, @ etc). To maintain access to WSJ.com, you MUST enter our partner’s website via BizNews Premium at least once a month. A final PS, if you had previously signed up for WSJ you’ll need to clear the cookies from your device. Our helpdesk can assist –[email protected].

Visited 37 times, 1 visit(s) today