Social media stocks: A bubble, or example of our inability to value exponential growth?

Roy-Topol-biznewsIt wasn’t long ago that early adopters of social media were ridiculed by their more conservative associates. If a dollar was thrown over every time some worthy chuckled that only twits tweet or how “bookface” would implode, Biznews would now be in the market for some tasty takeovers. These people weren’t just being facetious. We all battle to understand exponential growth. Our species sees growth in linear terms. We are not made to absorb or understand the mushrooming of the Internet, the doubling and re-doubling of the Naspers share price on the back of its Chinese investment in Tencent, or the global surge in social media. To our own cost. As one of the US’s most celebrated thinkers, nuclear physics professor Al Bartlett puts it: “The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.” In this piece, regular Biznews.com contributor, Investec portfolio manager Roy Topol, applies his mind to the explosion in prices of social media stocks. Is this a bubble? Or another reflection of how we do not understand exponential growth? – AH  

By Roy Topol*

Pundits around the world have been left scratching their heads while the social media share bubble continues to inflate. Their question is whether this is history repeating itself (as in the tech bubble of the late 1990s) or if it is something quite different. With the incredible share price performance and high valuations of the respective social media companies, combined with some staggeringly large private deals, their concern is understandable.

Let me start off by saying categorically that the current market is not nearly a frenzy of the same magnitude that we witnessed in the late 1990s. In those years, there were websites with no revenue that were raising capital and listing at ridiculous valuations. The PE ratio of the Nasdaq was at 193 times earnings at its March 2000 peak, versus its PE of 30 times currently.

The companies that are in favour nowadays have real business models and very high revenue growth rates. So it’s not fair to say that this is the same story repeating itself (in other words, that there is a risk that the PE could expand quite aggressively from the current 30x multiple – making this bubble much bigger than it currently is).

However, while we are unlikely to see a situation of these companies falling 80% in the space of a few years (as happened in the early 2000s), with valuations as high as they currently are, there is a real risk that these companies fail to continue at the growth rates that would justify their demanding multiples.

The graph below from The Wall Street Journal illustrates the concern about sustainable growth rates, showing how revenue growth for both Facebook and Twitter has been on a downward trend. This does not mean that they have stopped growing; rather the rate of growth has slowed (down below 4% quarterly growth for both companies).

Twitter came out with its inaugural set of quarterly results last week, and while revenue and profits beat consensus forecasts, the share price fell by an astonishing 24% that day, revealing just how volatile the social media shares can be to market perceptions and inflated expectations.The thing that got the market so worried was that timeline views dropped for the first time in Twitter’s history (see graph below). The implication of this is that although Twitter has started to generate substantial revenue from its users, the user experience may have been affected – meaning that those who use Twitter might be doing so less often.

The real problem that these social media companies face, in my opinion, is not necessarily how their profits are going to grow, but rather whether their market campaigns designed to generate revenue end up spoiling the user experience, encouraging users to abandon them and move over to the next social media craze.The competition in the space is so fierce that there is a real risk that Facebook or Twitter could be overtaken by a newer, cooler application that the younger generation enjoys using more. Snapchat is one app that kids in America have taken a liking to and that could knock Facebook off its perch.

The big names in social media are aware of this problem and this explains their eagerness to acquire, often at very steep valuations, social media start ups. The risk here is that they end up chasing “the new thing” too hard and end up overpaying for apps that fail to take off. Or, as in the case of Snapchat, the owners say “no” to a $3bn offer presented by Facebook (a 22 year old Mark Zuckerberg famously rejected a $1bn offer by Yahoo for Facebook after just two years of operations in July 2006).

The risk is perhaps too great to even consider buying a company that may take many years to grow into its valuation, if it indeed does end up doing so. But that is a risk that many people are willing to take at the moment as this bubble inflates itself with so much hot money. Hot money can turn cold very quickly, but for the meantime, with interest rates near zero, there is little reason to believe this bubble is going to run out of hot air anytime soon.

* Roy Topol is an Investment Manager at Investec Wealth & Investment. He qualified as a chartered accountant and joined Investec W&I from Deutsche Securities at the beginning of 2010. To read more of Roy’s contributions on Biznews.com, click here. 

Visited 82 times, 1 visit(s) today