SA web tool identifies service-delivery ‘hot-spots’ – but it can’t redistribute

CAPE TOWN — On the ground research about the youth of any area in South Africa and a web-tool enabling policy makers and local governments to access the resultant data may help address the glaring demographic disparities that drive so much ongoing strife. The author sets the scene by comparing employment, poverty and education now and in 1976 when the June 16th riots and police killings of protesting schoolchildren set the country aflame. By doing so, the ubiquity and potential of the new web tool are potently illustrated. In a carefully chosen example (perhaps because of the profound impact the lack of education Nkandla gave its most famous son), Nkandla and Sandton are compared for age, matriculants, employment, flushing toilets and electricity. The glaring disparities illustrate just how resources could be re-allocated to boost equity and create a generation of people able to uplift society more equitably. That’s all good and well, but somehow, we first need competent, qualified, skilled and mostly honest people in those municipal councils to enable redirected resources to reach people. And therein lies the rub. Unless of course, we use the NGO and private sector – and/or elect a new government… – Chris Bateman

By Ariane De Lannoy for The Conversation*

It is more than 40 years since young people, first in Soweto, and then around the country, rose up against the apartheid regime. Initially their protest was against the introduction of Afrikaans as the language of instruction in schools. But it quickly spread into a general uprising against apartheid.

Four decades later and more than two decades after democracy, what prospects do young South Africans have?

The end of apartheid should have heralded a new South African dream for the generation born at its demise. The “born frees” comprise about one fifth of the population. If the definition of youth is extended to include those between 15 and 34, they make up almost 55% of the population.

File Photo: A protester reacts in front of a burning tyre as he takes part in a service delivery protest in Mabopane, in the North West province. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko

The hope was that this generation would be living radically different lives from the young people who rose up in 1976. But that dream is still out of reach for most. Two thirds of the country’s children live in poverty. About 50% of young people are without jobs.

Without doubt, there have been key improvements. Education is now provided to all, and years of schooling have increased; child support grants have made substantial differences to nutrition and wellbeing; the delivery of public housing has helped many secure a home for the first time.

Yet the quality of life and opportunities for young people are still defined, to a large extent, by the legacies of their parents. This also means that young South Africans are in no position to help drive economic growth. The country is missing its demographic dividend moment.

Read also: Must read – why we must drop everything and create jobs yesterday.

So what can be done about it? An initiative that connects researchers and local governments, combined with a web tool that draws together detailed local information about young people, could help policy makers take a fine-grained rather than a scatter-gun approach to support youth wellbeing.

Missed chances

Life’s chances are determined by the quality of education. And that in turn is determined by the income of parents. South Africa’s schooling systems has failed young people abysmally. Drop out rates are shockingly high, with nearly half the country’s learners leaving the schooling system before they matriculate.

These numbers are dismal enough. But there’s an added twist. Unless a young person passes matric – or gets a tertiary qualification – their chances in the labour market are slim. An employer generally doesn’t distinguish between three years of schooling or six or eight or even ten.

Read also: Cutting through racial rhetoric – jobs, service delivery, crime stutter SA’s progress

It has given rise to a desperate group of young people known as NEETS, which stands for Not in Employment, Education or Training. They can include young people with matric, but all are unemployed and few have prospects for further education.

The government has consistently committed to putting youth development high on its national agenda. It has put a number of initiatives in place, including:

  • The adoption of a new youth policy in 2015. More recently, President Jacob Zuma promised that all government departments would prioritise programmes that are critical to youth development. There’s little evidence that the national youth policy and the ones that came before achieved anything.
  • In 2014 the National Treasury implemented a youth incentive employment tax to encourage employers to give young people their first foot in the door of an increasingly tight labour market. It’s too early to assess whether this is making a difference.
  • The creation of a policy-oriented research project on employment, income distribution and inclusive growth at the University of Cape Town (UCT) to look into the stubborn problems of youth unemployment, among other issues. The youth unemployment project is due to present its findings in the next few weeks.

Clearly more needs to be done. Later this month local governments will be asked to play a more proactive role in youth development. This could be a critical contribution.

Fresh attempt

A local approach could be significant because the spatial legacy of apartheid still largely determines a person’s life chances. This means that there are vast differences between young people based on where they live. This includes income, education and employment opportunities.

A web tool, called the Youth Explorer, has been developed to help a host of players, including policy makers, to access information about young people in a particular area. It does this by drilling down into conditions in every ward across the country.

A 360 degree photograph of the Zuma Must Fall protests in front of the South African Parliament buildings in Cape Town.

The Youth Explorer also allows for comparisons within provinces and between different rural and urban areas, allowing policymakers to compare one area to the country as a whole.

To illustrate its usefulness, take the information that’s been put together comparing Nkandla, President Jacob Zuma’s rural home constituency, and Sandton, one of the country’s wealthier urban areas. The profile shows that:

  • 22% of the population is between 15 and 24 years of age compared with just 10% in Sandton,
  • Just under 50% of young people aged between 20 and 24 have completed matric or higher. The comparable figure in Sandton is about 88%,
  • the NEETS category is about 31% in Nkandla and less than 7% in Sandton,
  • 76% of young people live in households with no access to the internet in Nkandla, compared with 13% in Sandton,
  • more than three quarters of people live in households where there is no employed adult, compared with 10% in Sandton, and
  • More than 50% of Nkandla homes have no electricity, hardly any have flush toilets (13% have no toilets at all), and 33% live in overcrowded households (defined as more than two people to a habitable room). In Sandton, only 2% have no electricity, everyone has access to a flush toilet and only 1% live in overcrowded households.

Detailed information like this could lead to focused policy interventions that are in tune with young people’s local realities, and conversations that may be able to break the inter-generational cycle of inequality and poverty area by area.

It could help ensure that the South African dream of the “Born-Free” generation may not be entirely lost.

The ConversationEmily Harris and Pippa Green co-authored this article.

Make Better Decisions. Start your Biznews Premium FREE TRIAL today.