The Editor's Desk - Fri 30 Jan 2026: The Goolam DMs - A staged suicide, a clenched fist, and an alleged R1m bounty

In today's Editor's Desk, Alec Hogg unpacks the sudden death of X commentator Goolam — a polarising “town crier” whose influence shaped South Africa’s political narrative battles. Alec revisits the anomalies raised about the scene, shares context from his own correspondence with Goolam, and asks what it means for truth-telling, free speech and personal safety in the digital age..Don't miss out on future episodes of The Editor's Desk. Subscribe to BizNews Premium and get the podcast delivered to your inbox daily..Watch here.Listen here.Read the full transcript of The Editor's Desk podcast below.Hello and welcome — I’m Alec Hogg. This is the Editor’s Desk, exclusive analysis for BizNews Premium members. It’s Friday, 30 January 2026, and I’m glad to have you with me.On the Editor’s Desk, we focus on what’s happening behind the scenes — and on the context behind what you read on BizNews.com. I’ve written about the death of Goolam, and I’ll share more on that in a moment. But today I want to talk about a different kind of currency to the one we usually track on BizNews.I want to talk about influence — and the price of truth in our beloved South Africa.If you’re on social media, and especially on X, you’ll know the name Goolam. For years, “Goolam V” was a digital phantom. To some, he was a hero — a whistleblower using short, sharp posts to expose the powerful. To others, he was a villain — a propagandist and attack dog in South Africa’s factional wars.But whether you loved him or loathed him, you couldn’t ignore him. His predictions were often uncannily accurate. His information seemed unusually well-sourced. He became a kind of town crier in the digital town square.And now, the town crier is dead.Reports surfaced earlier this week that Goolam was found dead in a hotel room in Sandton. The authorities are investigating, but already the debate is raging: was this a straightforward death — or something far darker?My colleague at BizNews, Chris Steyn, recently sat down with Juanita du Preez of Action Society to discuss the circumstances. We published that interview yesterday. Chris is an experienced investigative journalist, and she does not spook easily. But what emerged in that discussion raised uncomfortable questions.Du Preez’s view was blunt: to her, the scene looked staged — and she questioned why key details didn’t fit neatly into a simple explanation. Whether you agree with that assessment or not, the bigger point stands: the public deserves clarity, and speculation thrives when answers are slow.Du Preez also raised another issue that matters in a case like this: funding and motive. Goolam’s information was often too specific, too timely, to look like the work of a lone amateur. He drove narratives. He defended some political figures and went hard at others — including prominent voices in the RET faction and, more recently, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi. That naturally leads to difficult questions: who benefited from his voice, and who felt threatened by it?While others debated the public claims and counter-claims, I went back to my own archives — because to me, Goolam wasn’t only a handle. He was a potential interviewee.I’d been trying to get him onto BizNews for nearly two years. I wanted to understand the human being behind the avatar. Our correspondence began in June 2024, when I messaged him to invite an interview — anonymously, if he preferred. I offered every reasonable safeguard: audio-only, obscured identity, even a text-based interview if that was safer.He was polite. He said he’d come back to me soon. But he never did.A month later, in July 2024, he sent me a message that chilled me. He said he had left the country, and he alleged that Iqbal Survé had placed a R1 million bounty on his head.Because that is a serious allegation, I contacted Survé for comment. He denied it, calling it “complete rubbish” and saying there were legal complaints and cases involving Goolam. He also said questions about IOL reporting should be directed to IOL’s leadership.Whatever you make of those competing claims, pause on the human reality behind them: an anonymous political operator telling a journalist he’s frightened enough to flee — and the subject of that allegation rejecting it outright and pointing to legal action and reputational harm.Then, months later, Goolam messaged me again — not about politics, but about BizNews.He told me he was an avid follower of our work. He said he was downloading our videos and reposting them to X because, in his view, that’s how you beat the algorithm. He cited tools like Grok and ChatGPT and argued that a direct video upload dramatically outperformed a YouTube link in terms of views and engagement. He even apologised for using our content, saying BizNews was doing some of the best work in the country — and that he was trying to get that message in front of more eyes.That brings me to the point I want to land today — a point that stretches beyond South Africa.X is marketed as the global town square — a place where citizen journalists can break stories faster than legacy media, where free speech can flourish, and where the powerful can be challenged. In many ways, Goolam embodied that promise: an anonymous account that became influential, shaping conversation at a national scale.But there is a darker side to that reality.When an online voice becomes effective enough — when it bypasses gatekeepers and disrupts entrenched interests — it can become a target. And if an online identity can be traced, pressured, or threatened into silence, that sends a chilling message to every whistleblower, every anonymous account, every citizen journalist: we can find you.So where does that leave us?It leaves us with a death in a Sandton hotel room, and a police investigation that must be watched with hawk-like intensity. We need real answers, not rumours: who arranged the stay, who had access, what evidence exists, and what can be verified.Goolam was not a saint. He could be vicious. He made enemies. He also had influence — and he used it to drive narratives in South Africa’s roughest political battleground.And now he is gone.The question is whether we let the story end with noise and speculation — or whether we insist on verifiable answers.I’m going to leave it there for today. Keep an eye on your Premium newsletter for links to our freshest published content. Thanks for trusting us with your time. I’m Alec Hogg — until Monday. Cheerio.

The Editor's Desk - Fri 30 Jan 2026: The Goolam DMs - A staged suicide, a clenched fist, and an alleged R1m bounty

Related Stories