Silent dissents reveal growing resistance to Fed chair Powell’s rate cuts

Key topics:Fed cuts rates despite notable dissent and “silent” opposition.Regional Fed presidents largely opposed the December rate cut.Divisions may challenge Powell’s successor in 2026..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..By Catarina Saraiva.Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell downplayed dissenting votes against Wednesday’s decision to lower interest rates again, but a slew of finer details from the meeting revealed just how divided the central bank has become.Powell pushed through the quarter percentage point cut not only over the objection of a few voters. A much larger group of regional Fed bank presidents who participated in the debate but weren’t among this year’s voting roster also signaled they opposed the cut.The fractures could foreshadow what’s to come in 2026, when a new chair may struggle even more than Powell to marshal consensus at the Fed..“It’s very unusual. In my 10-plus years of being involved with the Fed, I haven’t seen this,” said Patrick Harker, who served as president of the Philadelphia Fed until his retirement in June. .Read more:.Fed cuts rates as Powell warns US labour market weakness emerging.Just two policymakers — Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid and Chicago’s Austan Goolsbee — formally dissented in favor of leaving rates unchanged. The other dissent came from Governor Stephen Miran, who continued to call for a larger rate reduction. The remaining protests came through different channels.In quarterly rate projections the Fed published alongside the decision, six policymakers said the benchmark federal funds rate should end 2025 in a range of 3.75% to 4% — where it stood before Wednesday’s cut — suggesting they opposed the move.Given that at least four and perhaps all of those six officials lacked a vote at the meeting, some Fed watchers have dubbed the high rate forecasts for 2025 as “silent dissents.” “I would’ve been one of those silent dissents,” Harker said. “I think the cut is a mistake.”There was yet another clue buried in the materials the Fed published Wednesday. In addition to the officials around the table, business leaders who comprise the boards of directors of the regional Fed banks also get to weigh in..They submit recommendations for another short-term rate set by the Fed, which in practice always moves up and down with the central bank’s main benchmark.Historically, that recommendation has served as a proxy for the bank president’s own preference. In this case, just four of the 12 regional banks requested a reduction, suggesting that eight presidents may have opposed the cut.That vote shows that the inclination to hold rates steady was concentrated among the presidents. Those officials have often favored higher interest rates than the members of the Fed’s Board of Governors in Washington, who are appointed by the White House and confirmed by the Senate.Powell argued in his post-meeting press conference that the economy right now — with inflation still well above the Fed’s 2% target and the labor market showing signs of weakening — is one where disagreements are to be expected.“A very large number of participants agree that risks are to the upside for unemployment and to the upside for inflation, so what do you do?” Powell said. “You’ve got one tool, you can’t do two things at once. It’s a very challenging situation.”.Read more:.Powell’s cautious tone triggers market selloff, dashes rate cut hopes for 2025.But with so many policymakers willing to make clear through their “silent” and formal dissents that they will stick to their guns, whomever President Donald Trump picks to replace Powell next year — including the frontrunner for the job, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett — is likely to face challenges in corralling the Federal Open Market Committee.“Chair Powell has been in the job for quite a long time and has a lot of respect on the FOMC,” said Calvin Tse, head of US strategy and economics at BNP Paribas. “If even under his leadership there are now three dissents, it is hard for me to see a new Fed chair that finds it easier to get unanimity among FOMC participants.”.© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Silent dissents reveal growing resistance to Fed chair Powell’s rate cuts

Related Stories

Your international payments could be simpler, faster and more cost-effective

Mailbox | The GNU: Two years, three tests

Intergenerational wealth transfer strategies to reduce tax drags

Britain's civic breakdown? SA got there first — 85% TV licence evasion rate and R467bn unpaid municipal bills