Key topics:Rubicon Trust’s role in the BHI Ponzi collapse and fund diversionOver R1.64bn in claims; less than 1% recovered to dateProtected RAF payouts misused, leaving vulnerable families exposed.Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox every morning on weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..By Bart Henderson*.Rubicon Trust Company Limited played a central part in the collapse of the BHI Trust investment scheme. While the broader BHI Ponzi scheme affected hundreds of investors, Rubicon’s actions stand out because it managed funds that South African law places under the highest level of protection: Road Accident Fund (RAF) compensation payouts.By mid-2025, the joint trustees of the insolvent BHI Trust had accepted proven claims from 823 investors totalling R1.64 billion. Independent estimates, which include losses not formally reported, suggest the total may exceed R3 billion. To date, only R12.4 million has been recovered — less than 1% of proven claims. As of 19 February 2026, no major additional recoveries have been announced, and the in-camera inquiry has provided limited public updates.Most investors in the BHI scheme were individuals who placed retirement savings, emergency funds, or family trusts with the scheme in the expectation of steady returns. Many were introduced through trusted networks. When statements stopped, and contact ended in late 2023, the losses left retirees, single parents and middle-class families without the financial security they had planned for. Some reported difficulty affording medication, education costs or basic living expenses..Read more:.BHI 2.0: Joburg broker disappears with R30m in alleged Ponzi scam.The more serious issue concerns the funds Rubicon Trust administered. From virtually the very beginning, Rubicon Trust was formed by Michael Haldane, and Sona Pillay was appointed as its director. Portions of trusts, wills, estates, and protected RAF accounts were moved into BHI Trust and BHI Plus.RAF payouts are not ordinary investments. These are court-ordered compensation for serious injuries or deaths caused by road accidents — amounts intended for lifelong nursing care, specialised equipment, home adaptations, rehabilitation and replacement of lost earnings.The Master of the High Court appoints trustees specifically to safeguard these funds, subject to strict fiduciary duties. Pillay, acting as trustee or co-trustee for many of these accounts, had authority to invest what were described as “surplus” or “long-term” portions.The funds were placed with BHI, and beneficiaries received regular statements and distributions that appeared to come from the RAF awards themselves. When beneficiaries questioned lower returns or delays, the responses cited market conditions or administrative requirements.After the BHI scheme collapsed in October 2023, the diverted RAF funds were no longer available. Rubicon Trust had managed dozens of such accounts, including Bewind trusts, inter vivos trusts, and RAF-related matters, under Pillay’s oversight.The effects on beneficiaries were direct. One quadriplegic man, injured in a truck accident and awarded an R18 million structured RAF payout, lost access to funded night nursing care. His wife now handles all turning and care alone.A young woman with traumatic brain injury from a pedestrian accident had to stop speech and occupational therapy that had been helping her regain basic functions. A widow whose husband died in a 2019 taxi crash lost the portion of her RAF lump sum that was meant for her children’s education; the eldest daughter had to leave university.These cases illustrate a wider pattern. Families who had already dealt with severe trauma faced renewed hardship when the funds intended to support recovery disappeared.As of 19 February 2026, no separate criminal charges have been filed against Pillay or Rubicon Trust specifically for the handling of RAF funds. The Master of the High Court has not issued any public findings on breaches of fiduciary duty in these matters.The contrast with the position of other individuals linked to the BHI scheme is notable. Some have been sentenced, debarred or had charges provisionally withdrawn, while others have left the country. Forensic information has traced substantial flows involving BHI, yet accountability for the specific diversion of protected RAF funds through Rubicon has remained limited, if not non-existent.This situation highlights gaps in oversight of trust companies that administer court-protected funds. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), the National Prosecuting Authority and the Master of the High Court each have roles in preventing and/or investigating such outcomes.The events at Rubicon suggest a need for clearer rules on how trustees may invest RAF or similar protected monies, stronger monitoring of compliance officers, and faster intervention when high-yield placements are involved.The BHI collapse and Rubicon Trust’s role in it show how protected funds can be placed at risk through seemingly routine investment decisions. The focus now should be on ensuring that the legal safeguards intended for RAF beneficiaries actually work.That these funds in particular were stolen is a matter of record.That Pillay diverted these funds for personal gain is demonstrable and also a matter of record.There is white-collar crime, then there is the depravity of the descent into literal grave robbers that Haldane and co, through Rubicon Trust, stooped to..Read more:.BHI Ponzi: Fraud accused walk free as prosecutors drop charges — victims left in limbo.That the South African Police Service and the National Prosecuting Authority haven’t treated this as a heinous priority crime, warranting their full might being brought to bear, speaks of either complete apathy, lack of competency and skill, or simply an inability to recognise the criminal BHI Trust Ponzi and its offshoots for what they actually were.As despicable as any I’ve encountered, studied or researched during my almost 30 years investigating white collar crime.It is a Life Esidimeni, as deeply cruel, evil, and devastating for many, only instead unseen, hiding behind pluses and minuses in some journal entries on some companies’ books.Books nobody seems to care a jot about, when it’s all there.In this, too lays the very definition of disgrace..*Bart Henderson is a prominent South African forensic investigator, certified fraud examiner, and reputational risk management advisor. As the CEO of Henderson Solutions, he has built a decades-long career exposing high-profile corporate fraud, corruption, and financial mismanagement in South Africa.