Cost of BEE quantified - 4m lost jobs; trillions in GDP. Will Ramaphosa now remove his blinkers?

A groundbreaking new report by the Free Market Foundation and Solidarity Research Institute delivers a devastating audit of Cyril Ramaphosa’s pet policy. Quantifying the true cost of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment for the first time, researchers reveal how it hollowed out South Africa’s economy, blocked investment, entrenched unemployment - and disempowered the very people it was meant to uplift..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here.The auditorium doors will open for BNIC#2 on 10 September 2025 in Hermanus. For more information and tickets, click here..Watch here.Listen here.BizNews Reporter.A damning new report by the Free Market Foundation (FMF) and Solidarity Research Institute (SRI) has laid bare the devastating economic cost of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) - revealing that the policy may have done more harm than good to the very people it was meant to empower.In a recent BizNews interview with Dr Morné Malan of the FMF and Theuns du Buisson of Solidarity, editor Alec Hogg unpacked the shocking findings: trillions in lost GDP, millions of jobs never created, and a rising tide of disillusionment cutting across racial and economic lines.R145–R290 billion a year in compliance costs aloneThe report estimates that private sector compliance with BEE regulations costs the economy between R145 billion and R290 billion annually. These costs include spending on skills development, enterprise development, and ownership reallocation as per BEE scorecards.Dr Malan explained that the methodology relied on publicly available figures from the BEE Commission and corporate disclosures. “We worked out the maximum potential cost of full compliance and compared that to actual reported compliance levels,” he said. “Even our conservative estimates reflect massive economic leakage.”But Malan was clear: these are only the direct costs. The true burden is far greater when considering indirect impacts - missed investments, stunted growth, and the chilling effect on innovation.R5 trillion in lost GDP - and countingAccording to Theuns du Buisson, the most staggering figure is the R5 trillion in lost GDP since BEE was intensified around 2007. That’s money that could have been used to grow the economy, build infrastructure, and create jobs.“If we had grown at our natural trajectory - about 3% more per year - we would’ve seen GDP expand by 118%, not just 29.4%,” said Du Buisson. “We’d be slightly ahead of Brazil. Instead, we’ve fallen 39 places behind them in global rankings.”He noted that this decline coincides with the most aggressive phase of BEE enforcement - proof, he argues, that race-based economic engineering has backfired catastrophically.Four million jobs that never wereOne of the most explosive findings in the report is that South Africa could have had 4 million more jobs today if BEE hadn’t dragged down growth.Using an employment elasticity model tailored to South Africa’s labour dynamics, the researchers applied Okun’s Law to project job creation under alternative growth conditions. The result? A current workforce of 21 million, instead of 17 million.Of the 3.8 million “missing jobs”, Du Buisson estimates that over 3.2 million would have gone to black South Africans.“BEE is disempowering the majority, not uplifting them,” he said. “That’s the cruel irony.”Starlink and the rural digital divideThe report also cites the exclusion of technologies like Starlink as emblematic of BEE’s unintended consequences. Starlink’s satellite broadband could have transformed rural connectivity - especially for underdeveloped black communities. But due to ownership restrictions imposed by BEE policies, the project stalled.“Most of our rural population is black, and they’re being locked out of the digital economy,” Du Buisson said. “This isn’t transformation - it’s regression.”Cyril Ramaphosa: Architect and beneficiaryBEE’s most visible champion remains President Cyril Ramaphosa, who not only benefited handsomely from early empowerment deals but also chaired the very first BEE Commission. Despite mounting economic evidence and growing public frustration, Ramaphosa has doubled down - calling for stricter enforcement and even convening a “national dialogue” to entrench the policy further.“This is like telling your doctor to stop warning you about smoking,” said Dr Malan. “We’re being asked to pretend BEE is good for the economy, when the data shows the opposite.”Derangement and disillusionmentAlec Hogg posed a provocative question during the interview: is South Africa’s political elite suffering from “derangement” - so insulated by privilege and ideology that they no longer grasp the real-world impact of their policies?Malan agreed. “The ANC has so tightly linked its identity to BEE that it can’t imagine itself without it. But the country is waking up. Disillusionment is growing, and that’s why we’re seeing such nervous energy from the top.”What comes next: Awareness and legal actionBoth organisations plan to push hard for change.The FMF will continue to raise public awareness and invite independent scholars to replicate or challenge their findings. Meanwhile, Solidarity is pursuing litigation against racial quotas in employment and remains open to expanding legal challenges.“This is just the beginning,” Du Buisson said. “We want to build a future based on merit, growth, and shared opportunity - not skin colour.”A turning point?The report presents a clear message: BEE, as currently designed and enforced, is an economic albatross. It is neither empowering the poor nor creating a sustainable future. Instead, it is enriching a politically connected elite while draining the rest of the country.With unemployment at crisis levels and growth stagnating, the choice ahead is stark: double down on ideology or pivot to reality.South Africans may not agree on every policy detail - but few can afford to ignore numbers like these.

Cost of BEE quantified - 4m lost jobs; trillions in GDP. Will Ramaphosa now remove his blinkers?

Related Stories

Chris Hattingh: Time for South Africa to get serious about sovereign defence

Jim O’Neill on BizNews: China’s $1.2trn problem may spark a new “Plaza Accord”

Moving funds to or from South Africa? Here’s the easier, more affordable route

SA should be aiming a lot higher on job creation: Geordin Hill-Lewis