Juan Pablo Spinetto: The US is doing the dirty work that Latin America’s leaders wouldn’t

Key topics:US captures Maduro, ending Chavista rule in Venezuela.Trump’s unilateral action sparks regional political debate.Latin American leaders face pressure to guide democratic transition..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..By Juan Pablo Spinetto.Removing Venezuela’s dictator introduced “Trump’s Corollary” in Latin America with an exclamation point. The White House’s updated take on the Monroe Doctrine had its baptism of fire on Saturday, when US forces captured Nicolás Maduro at his Caracas stronghold, decapitating the Chavista regime responsible for bankrupting one of the world’s richest oil nations. Less than a month after Washington unveiled a new National Security Strategy pledging to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere — by force if necessary — Maduro and his wife are on their way to New York to face “narco-terrorism” charges. Capped by Donald Trump’s subsequent vow to temporarily run Venezuela outright, this day will feature in history books for decades.For Latin America, the episode is a blunt reminder: When divided regional leaders fail to produce homegrown solutions to their gravest crises, the risk that the US will step in — and act alone — is ever present. That risk is heightened by the return of great-power competition and Trump’s transactional, spheres-of-influence worldview. The region now faces the uncomfortable prospect of the US remotely administering a mid-sized South American country bordering Brazil and holding the world's largest oil reserves, with little regional input.Reactions among Latin American leaders split along predictable ideological lines. Left-wing governments in Brazil, Chile and Mexico joined Cuba in condemning an intervention that violated Venezuela’s sovereignty. Right-leaning leaders in Argentina and Ecuador welcomed the departure of the hated mustachioed dictator. Yet both positions can be true at once. Trump acted with evident disregard for international law in pursuing unilateral regime change — but Maduro and his cronies also tempted fate far beyond the odds. They had multiple opportunities to negotiate a political transition. Instead, Maduro chose to steal the 2024 election so brazenly that even his closest allies withheld support in his final days. He is now likely to follow the path of Panama’s Manuel Noriega nearly four decades ago: ending his days in an American jail, rueing having overplayed his hand. No more dancing.Rather than strongly protesting a historic US intervention on South American soil, Latin American governments might pause to reflect on the many chances they missed to confront the region’s worst political catastrophe of the century. Cynically focused on domestic calculations and commercial ties with Chavismo, leaders from Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to Argentina’s Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Mexico's Andrés Manuel López Obrador were, at a minimum, complicit as a gangster kleptocracy entrenched itself in Venezuela and metastasized into a destabilizing regional force. The moments when Maduro was treated as a peer — as Lula did by rolling out the red carpet in Brasília in 2023 — or when governments played dumb as millions of Venezuelans fled across borders should stand as reminders of a region that failed to act in its broader interest.Some will argue that the US risks losing legitimacy by assuming control of a sovereign nation, echoing its imperialist past. That judgment will depend on Trump’s next steps — and on whether he is committed to forcing a democratic transition now that he “owns” the problem. That would require respecting the will of Venezuelan voters and honoring the results of the last election, which showed opposition candidate Edmundo González Urrutia winning roughly 70% of the vote.Don’t underestimate the regional popularity of Trump’s move. Latin America is shifting decisively to the right and Maduro is deeply despised. Driving through Buenos Aires this morning, I spotted a young man riding his bike, Venezuelan flag fluttering behind him. Millions share that sentiment. While anti-Americanism persists, societies increasingly consumed by insecurity, corruption and narcotrafficking may — at least temporarily — applaud the American cowboy for imposing some order, even under questionable premises. In this context, Cuba’s derelict dictatorship may loom as the next domino to fall in a region changing at remarkable speed. Latin America’s heavy electoral calendar this year will also test the impact of Trump's interventionist move.Chief among the many unknowns is how Venezuela will be governed in the coming weeks. Latin American governments retain a chance to redeem themselves by helping to shape a democratic exit that enables recovery, limits Trump’s influence and avoids repeating past US mistakes in the region. Instead of immolating themselves in defense of a regime that has effectively collapsed, Lula and fellow leftists such as Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum and Colombia’s Gustavo Petro should embrace the historic role they could still play in steering a peaceful and positive transition. There is much Latin America can do — from supporting economic reconstruction, which will be demanding, to supplying humanitarian aid and facilitating the return of millions forced into exile in the past two decades. The Venezuelan people will remember who helped — and who did not..© 2026 Bloomberg L.P.

Juan Pablo Spinetto: The US is doing the dirty work that Latin America’s leaders wouldn’t

Related Stories