The Economist: A tie-up between Honda and Nissan will not fix their problems

Honda's revival of the Prelude as a hybrid-electric car was overshadowed by talks of a merger with Nissan, creating a potential automotive giant alongside Mitsubishi. The move aims to tackle challenges from fast-moving Chinese EV rivals and market uncertainties, including potential U.S. tariffs. While shareholders of Nissan and Mitsubishi cheered, Honda's investors were cautious. Yet, merging two struggling firms may not solve the core issue: keeping pace with the industry's rapid innovation..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here..The seventh BizNews Conference, BNC#7, is to be held in Hermanus from March 11 to 13, 2025. The 2025 BizNews Conference is designed to provide an excellent opportunity for members of the BizNews community to interact directly with the keynote speakers, old (and new) friends from previous BNC events – and to interact with members of the BizNews team. Register for BNC#7 here..From The Economist, published under licence. The original article can be found on www.economist.com© 2024 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved..The Economist.Speed, not scale, is what they require___STEADY_PAYWALL___.Honda put nostalgia to the fore on December 18th when it announced that the Prelude, a nameplate last produced some 25 years ago, now being relaunched as a hybrid-electric, would come with the option of a system that simulates gear changes and combustion-engine noises. The message, however, was quickly drowned out by news with far more bearing on the Japanese carmaker's future. It is considering merging with Nissan, a floundering domestic rival, to create the world's third-largest carmaker by sales, behind only Toyota and Volkswagen. Yet joining together will not fix the problems of a duo stuck in the past..Both firms have struggled with the upheaval in the car industry. Keeping pace with Chinese rivals in their home market and, increasingly, around the world requires rolling out electric vehicles (EVs) and investing heavily in software while continuing to sell the petrol cars that will finance the shift. Donald Trump's threats to levy tariffs when he re-enters the White House, and the possibility of retaliation, has added uncertainty. Honda and Nissan seem to have concluded that a partnership to develop EVs unveiled in March will not be enough..Nissan in particular is dangerously weak. Operating profit plunged almost 90% in the six months to September, compared with a year before. Its market share has dwindled in North America, its most important market, and sales have gone downhill in China. Although it announced 9,000 layoffs and a 20% cut in manufacturing capacity in November, investors remain unconvinced that it has a clear strategy for EVs or hybrids, which are growing in popularity with car buyers..An enlarged group made up of Honda, Nissan and probably Mitsubishi, a smaller carmaker in which Nissan has a controlling stake, could invest more in technology to catch up with rivals. The news of a potential tie-up has been greeted with glee by shareholders in Nissan and Mitsubishi, as well as France's Renault, which holds a 36% stake in Nissan (it might sell some of this to Honda or else convert it into a stake in a less troubled car firm). Honda's investors, though, seem wary; its shares fell on the news..A deal would undoubtedly mean cost savings through factory closures and job losses, even in Japan, where restructuring is frowned upon. The ministry which oversees the car industry called the reports "a positive development". That is probably because the alternative—a foreign takeover—is even more unpalatable to the Japanese government..Rumours have swirled that Foxconn, a Taiwanese contract manufacturer that wants to become as dominant in the production of cars as it is in consumer electronics, was talking to Nissan about a takeover that would have allowed it to acquire skills in designing and producing hardware such as chassis and suspension systems. Chinese carmakers might also be interested in buying Nissan for its production facilities in America, which would help them sidestep punitive tariffs on imported EVs. Foxconn's approach is likely to have accelerated talks between Honda and Nissan..Would a deal secure the future of the firms involved, though? Pooling resources would help. Yet the biggest advantage Chinese firms have is not scale but speed. New models are developed in three years or fewer, half the time it takes foreign firms. Software is updated in the blink of an eye. No legacy carmaker from Japan, America or Europe has yet worked out how to match the pace at which Chinese carmakers are innovating. Bringing together two ponderous Japanese giants, whose best years may be behind them, is unlikely to be the answer..Read also:.🔒 Nissan and Honda in merger talks to create auto giant, Foxconn also in hunt for stakeAsian auto giants Toyota and Tata thrive on hybrid boomVW, Isuzu snub SA's EV push, stick to fuel cars

The Economist: A tie-up between Honda and Nissan will not fix their problems

Related Stories

Someone else's Porsche: a 911 to Dullstroom and the case for buying used

Uber's Durban-based African partner says EV demand turbocharged by Iran

Driven: Porsche 911 GTS - The sweet spot gets sharper

Ramaphosa says Chinese EV makers to roll out charging network in SA