UCT controversy threatens academic freedom and research partnerships: Kenneth Kgwadi

Key topics:UCT’s anti-Israel stance threatens academic freedom and expression.Academic boycott may block research ties with Israeli institutions.Politicising universities risks funding loss and societal setbacks..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..By Kenneth Kgwadi*.UCT’s anti-Israel stance impedes academic partnerships and collaborations.The University of Cape Town’s (UCT) anti-Israel position compromises the academic freedom espoused in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa as a form of freedom of expression in Section 16. It is appalling to see one of South Africa’s premier universities vehemently rejecting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism, where it claims the definition is false and that it conflates criticising Israel’s policies with antisemitism.In its efforts to discredit Israeli academics and scholars, UCT adopted a resolution to enforce an academic boycott, which prohibited its academics from working with any research group or association whose author affiliations are with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). This decision by the university is misguided and unrealistic, as most Israelis, young and old, have deeper and direct connections to their military service. If passed, this resolution could end any possible or ongoing research and academic partnerships between UCT and Israeli universities, which would have dire implications for academia and the broader society that benefits from the research outcomes.The university is an intellectual space where scholarly debates are often held. These scholarly discussions, which are considered festivals of ideas, are helpful as they result in the discovery of innovative solutions that could drastically transform our society. It is under this backdrop that universities should never be weaponised and politicised to serve a narrow political or ideological conviction. UCT has a contribution to make in finding a lasting solution to the longest historical Israel-Palestine conflict through its research and intellectual capabilities..Read more:.“The liberation of UCT”: Anti-Woke candidates win all four alumni council seats – Richard Wilkinson.I am deeply concerned as a postgraduate from Israeli-based Ben Gurion University of the Negev (BGU) that this resolution will be expanded to include even people like myself who have never had anything to do with the IDF. This move by the university could be a serious setback for someone like me, as it would exclude me from working or associating with South African universities on the basis that I have links with the Israeli institutions of learning. Our Constitution was constructed to protect people like me from those who want to bar others in academia and the research world based on their links and connections.It is important to note that these two resolutions, if implemented, could see the university losing the donations worth R200 million or more, as funders are going to withdraw. We have to think thoroughly about how the withdrawal of funds will affect the students, researchers, the university, and the society that benefits from the innovative research. We have many students who are roaming the streets because they could not continue with their studies due to a lack of funding. We need donors and other sources of funding to keep our students in the lecture halls and make sure that they become central players of the mainstream economy. Politicising the conflict, which does not directly concern us, will impede our progress as a society. Our role could be to mediate for lasting peace and security, not to interfere or encourage conflict to take place.The political posture in the UCT council proves the existence of subjectivism and bias in their approach to rejecting the definition adopted by IHRA without any reasonable grounds.Professor Adam Mendelsohn from the UCT’s Department of Historical Studies was targeted and vilified for his opposition to the two demeaning resolutions adopted without proper consultation and engagement by the university council. Despite him being cleared by investigations, he remains suspended by the university. His suspension emanated from his opposition to those two resolutions, which are anti-Israel.Institutions of learning and training should never be used as a political tool to pursue a narrow political and ideological agenda. Their sole purpose is to seek a developmental agenda through intellectualism, innovation, and idea generation to the problems confronted by societies. The university should never discriminate against a particular group of people due to diverse political beliefs. UCT, as a premier university in the African region, should be in a position to tolerate everyone regardless of their political, social, or economic standing..*Kgwadi is a research fellow at the Middle East Africa Research Institute (MEARI). He holds a Master of Arts in African Studies.

UCT controversy threatens academic freedom and research partnerships: Kenneth Kgwadi

Related Stories

Hague Group boss Gandikota-Nellutla exposes her anti-Israel agenda: Kenneth Kgwadi

Tim Flack: Science behind Sooliman's press - partnering for impact

Dot Field: Freedom from violence cannot wait for another Freedom Day

Kenneth Kgwadi: The misplaced outrage over the ‘Palestinian flag row.’