Tshwane’s 2025 audit: A R4.3bn black hole and the high cost of a leaky bucket

Key topics:R4.3bn audit shortfall triggers qualified opinion and balance-sheet red flagsNearly 40% water losses and 21% electricity losses drain billionsRooiwal pollution and R3.2bn irregular spend expose service delivery risks.Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..BizNews Reporter.If you ever needed hard evidence that the road to recovery for South Africa’s municipalities is paved with potholes—both literal and financial—you need only look at the capital city’s latest financials. The City of Tshwane has released its audit report for the year ended 30 June 2025, and for those of us looking for the "rational perspective," the numbers make for grim reading.We were tipped off to the existence of these awful financials through the JSE’s Stock Exchange News Service. Tshwane has approximately R2.3bn in negotiable debt instruments listed on the JSE’s Bond Exchange - fixed rate bonds that pay an interest rate of around 10% and mature in mid-2028. As a result, the Metro is required to report on its financial condition to bondholders via the JSE’s SENS. Its numbers are certified by the Auditor General of SA, the statutory body which applies the same level of checking of accounts that auditing firms like PwC and Deloitte apply for private sector entities. We often talk about the difference between "noise" and "signal" here at BizNews. The noise is the spinning that inevitably accompanies anything to do with finances, with opposition politicians often accused by incumbents of exaggerating problems. This is very much the case in Tshwane, where a “Mr Fix-it” executive mayor (Cilliers Brink of the DA) was ousted in a political deal that saw a former ally switch sides and be rewarded with the mayoral chain (Action SA’s Nasiphi Moya).The noise, however, cannot disguise the signal provided by a balance sheet. And right now, Tshwane’s balance sheet is flashing red.The Auditor-General issued a qualified audit opinion. In the polite, understated language of auditors, a "qualification" usually means "we believe these numbers, except for these massive errors." In the private sector, a qualified audit can lead to a decline in the share price and the subsequent dismissal of the executives responsible. In Tshwane’s case, the qualified audit is directly linked to a R4.3 billion shortfall. The AG found that contingencies—funds the City needs to set aside for future liabilities—were understated by R4,322,251,120. That is not a rounding error; it is a fundamental distortion of the City’s financial reality.But for the ratepayer, the investor, and the resident, the concern goes far deeper than accounting adjustments. It goes to the very heart of service delivery: the ability to keep the lights on and the taps running.The report reveals a municipality that is essentially a leaky bucket. Water losses have climbed to nearly 40%. To be precise, 39.1% of the water Tshwane purchased—for R1.7 billion—simply disappeared. Some of this is "technical," leaking out of ageing pipes. But a significant portion is "non-technical," the AG’s euphemism for theft, unbilled consumption and inaccurate metering.The electricity situation is hardly better. The City lost R1.87 billion in electricity purchases, representing 21% of its total purchases. Again, much of this is due to theft, tampering, and illegal connections. When you combine these figures, you have billions of rands—money that should be maintaining roads or funding clinics—vanishing into thin air. It is the classic definition of a broken business model: the paying minority is being asked to subsidise a massive, unchecked administrative failure.Perhaps the most damning section of the report, however, concerns the human cost of this mismanagement. The AG highlighted the Rooiwal Wastewater Treatment Works as a "material irregularity." For years, we have heard reports of pollution in the Apies River and a health crisis in Hammanskraal. The audit confirms that the City has failed to take reasonable measures to prevent this environmental degradation. This is no longer just a governance issue; it is a humanitarian one that exposes the City to significant legal liability and future rehabilitation costs.The report also depicts a municipality struggling with the fundamentals of asset management. Infrastructure assets were not valued accurately, and internal controls were inadequate. Irregular expenditure totals R3.2 billion, primarily due to non-compliance with supply chain management laws. When contracts are awarded to providers whose tax matters aren't in order, or when performance isn't monitored—as was the case here—it suggests a system where consequences are optional.There is a long road ahead. The City has advised that this report will be officially tabled at the council meeting by 30 January 2026. Between now and then, the political spin doctors will be working overtime. But for our tribe—the rational investors and business leaders who fund this system—the signal is clear.You cannot fix a management crisis with a chequebook, and you cannot run a modern city when you lose 40% of your primary product before it reaches the customer. Tshwane’s latest numbers are a stark reminder that while the will to fix South Africa’s metros may be there, the execution capability is still dangerously thin.

Tshwane’s 2025 audit: A R4.3bn black hole and the high cost of a leaky bucket

Key topics:

Related Stories