AI Music eating deeply into Spotify, iTunes - and it has only just begun

Key topics:AI-generated music floods platforms, raising concerns for human artists' income.Deezer plans to label AI tracks to improve transparency and combat fraud.Calls grow for fair licensing and regulation to protect human creators' rights..Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here.The auditorium doors will open for BNIC#2 on 10 September 2025 in Hermanus. For more information and tickets, click here..By Lionel Laurent.The song Echoes of Tomorrow is a laid-back, catchy tune that might happily slot into a summertime playlists on Spotify or Apple Music. Only the lyrics, which make curious references to “algorithms,” reveal its non-human creator: Artificial intelligence.The track’s mimicry of flesh-and-blood pop is pretty unsettling. Yet what’s really disturbing is the sheer quantity of similar AI tunes sloshing around online. Tools like Udio and Suno, trained on millions of songs crafted by human artists, are now churning out millions of their own tunes at the click of a button. Deezer SA, a rival of Spotify Technology SA, estimates 20,000 AI tracks are uploaded to its platform daily, or 18% of the total. While they only account for 0.5% of total listens, real royalties are being earned and often fraudulently so, judging by the spread of bots to amplify listens. This may not be a Napster-scale issue yet — but the $20 billion music market is clearly vulnerable.Which is why Deezer is now trying a little more sunlight to disinfect its platform. It’s going to start labeling AI-generated content, based on proprietary software. On a recent visit to the firm’s Paris headquarters, I watched on a laptop as the detection tool quickly spotted the telltale signs of a computer-composed song — in this case, Echoes of Tomorrow — with what it says is 100% accuracy. It turns out that while human ears can be fooled, AI-generated music can be detected from statistical patterns used in its creation. That’s helped the fight against fraud behind the scenes; now it’s going to empower listeners.Deezer deserves two cheers for this — and maybe one nervous gulp. Increased transparency about the provenance of music is one way to ensure a fairer playing field in a market whose pay-per-stream model already felt unequal for artists lower down the food chain. It’s also a good way to indirectly put pressure on the bigger platforms like Spotify to follow suit and show users what they’re paying for. Much of Spotify’s $145 billion market cap is built on expectations of price hikes and premium subscription tiers — these would be harder to justify if built on AI content masquerading as the the real thing..Read more:.The guy who created Spud’ on the return of his ‘Frankenstein’ … and a musical – John van der Ruit.Yet what remains worrying is the extent to which AI music is overwhelmingly cannibalizing, not feeding, the human artists on which it was trained without compensation. As Deezer’s own experience attests, the utopian view of AI empowering creators by taking care of low-value tasks isn’t what’s happening: Instead, royalty-collecting society CISAC estimates AI music’s growth through 2028 will come largely at the expense of humans, generating an estimated €10 billion ($11.5 billion) of revenue by substituting artists’ work. And while streaming platforms have a role to play here, so do governments and regulators if AI firms are to also improve transparency on the sources of their training data.”We’re seeing AI music shrink the royalty pool for human artists,” says Ed Newton-Rex, an AI music specialist and founder of nonprofit lobby group Fairly Trained. “There are real economic consequences to this technology.”Detecting and flagging AI music at the point of distribution is just the start. What’s also needed is a model that protects artists who are threatened at the point of generation — such as paid licensing deals between copyright holders and tech platforms like Suno, which are currently in discussion. Newton-Rex says that detection tools like Deezer’s could be used by streaming platforms for sanctioning AI tools that don’t respect musicians’ rights by removing their uploaded content. He has a point. If human creativity really is going to get a boost from new tech tools, Echoes of Tomorrow has to be yesterday’s news..© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.

AI Music eating deeply into Spotify, iTunes - and it has only just begun

Related Stories

Race Is a Human Invention - But That Doesn't Make It Useless

Ivo Vegter: Stop fearing Artificial Intelligence. Start fearing its would-be masters

Is the AI arms race about to outrun human judgment? The Economist thinks so

Ivo Vegter: Why AI job destruction is the ultimate engine of human prosperity