Rise of designer animals: Gene-edited 'Dire Wolves' spark debate - F.D Flam

Key topics:Colossal's gene-edited pups aren't true dire wolvesSynthetic biology advances toward designer animalsDe-extinction hype masks real conservation challenges .Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here..By F.D. Flam.In a wildly misleading announcement for what is still an amazing achievement, researchers at a Dallas-based startup claimed they’d created dire wolves, a species that has been extinct for more than 12,000 years. To make the news more irresistible, there were images of adorable white fluffy pups named Romulus and Remus.Scientists outside the company, Colossal Biosciences, say the pups aren’t really the same dire wolves that roamed North America during the last Ice Age. But they do represent an impressive feat of genetic manipulation that could usher in a new era of designer animals.The dire wolf announcement exemplifies today’s P.T. Barnum style of doing science, where projects are funded by billionaires and celebrities and the results are packaged to sell. Colossal made international headlines last month when it announced it had created a genetically modified mouse with a mammoth-like woolly coat. The company had already announced that it had raised more than $435 million toward its ultimate goal to “de-extinct” the woolly mammoth. There are also plans for a dodo bird and Tasmanian tiger.But what they’re doing is not cloning, de-extinction or resurrection of ancient beasts.“De-extinction has a warm and fuzzy feeling associated with it because it’s trying to rectify a loss,” said University of Chicago evolutionary biologist Neil Shubin. “That’s not what they did here….they took a gray wolf genome, and they modified it to make a new kind of animal.” Designer animals are interesting, he said, but they don’t create that same sense that their existence makes the world a better place.“Getting dragged into arguments about species definitions is a distraction from the real achievement,” Colossal said in a statement.“This is the most significant advancement in gene-editing in history.”The biotech and genetic engineering company began in 2020 when billionaire entrepreneur Ben Lamm met up with Harvard geneticist George Church. For years, Church had talked about his dreams of “de-extincting” the woolly mammoth. He was one of the early developers of gene editing, which is used in creating the company’s animals.Dire wolves, made famous by Game of Thrones, weighed as much as 150 pounds — about 25% bigger than gray wolves. Lamm told The New Yorker that his company’s popularity was being buoyed by the big-dreaming attitude of Elon Musk..Read more:.Wild insights: What we can learn about stress from animals.Some scientists have long dreamed of recreating mammoths like the fictional scientists who made dinosaurs in Jurassic Park. They’d find preserved DNA, insert it into an egg cell and voila, a clone.That’s turned out to be a lot harder in real life. But scientists can extract DNA from ancient fossils and study it to locate key genetic differences that separate elephants from mammoths, dire wolves from gray wolves, or Neanderthals from us.The real dire wolf lineage diverged from the ancestors of the gray wolf about 5.7 million years ago, and its DNA differs in hundreds of thousands of places. While the main attraction at Colossus has been recreating a woolly mammoth, its scientists found the dire wolf easier to approximate. They started with samples of dire wolf DNA from fossilized bones and teeth borrowed from museums. The ancient DNA was compared to that of gray wolves. Scientists then picked 20 genetic differences deemed most important to the dire wolf’s distinct appearance and combined them with gray wolf DNA using gene editing. The new DNA was turned into puppies by injecting it into egg cells taken from dogs. And dogs were used as surrogate mothers. The first pups were born last October in a Caesarean section. In addition to twins Romulus and Remus, now about 6 months old, there is a third pup, Khaleesi, named after a character in Game of Thrones. According to the company, the pups live in an undisclosed location in a 2,000-acre compound. Colossal was secretive about the wolf project, unlike its plans for the mammoth and other animals. Its findings haven’t been published in a scientific journal. I touched on the company’s ventures last month when I wrote a column about its woolly mammoth project.If a scientific paper can support details on the creation of the dire wolf-like pups, it will represent a significant breakthrough in genetics, given the unprecedented number of gene edits performed simultaneously.“Even our harshest critics admit it. As one of our founders stated, ‘this is the moon landing of synthetic biology,’” the company’s statement said.Jurassic Park dreams aside, the technology might prove useful for conservation, said S. Blair Hedges, a geneticist at Temple University. But it won’t get to the heart of the biodiversity crisis, he said, which is mostly from habitat destruction.“There are thousands of species….that are going extinct every day,” he said. “There are species that will go extinct without anybody ever discovering them.”It would be an entirely different scientific achievement if scientists could somehow reconstitute or synthesize all the DNA of a dire wolf, dodo, or mammoth. We’d get to see what these animals really looked like. That’s a long way off, but not outside the realm of possibility. Until then, more designer animals could be on the way, and that’s what we should be discussing..© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Rise of designer animals: Gene-edited 'Dire Wolves' spark debate - F.D Flam

Related Stories

Ivo Vegter: Stop fearing Artificial Intelligence. Start fearing its would-be masters

Cambridge historians see SpaceX and think East India Company — and the parallels are alarming

Kenneth Rogoff on BizNews: AI gold rush has winners and losers — Africa not in the running

Is the AI arms race about to outrun human judgment? The Economist thinks so