Struggling Lonmin prices rights issue at 94% discount, a folly say analysts

JOHANNESBURG, Nov 9 (Reuters) – Platinum producer Lonmin on Monday priced its $407 million rights issue at a 94 percent discount as the firm fights for survival in the face of depressed commodity prices.

Lonmin said it would sell 27 billion shares at 1.00 pence each to its shareholders, compared with the stock’s last trading price of 16.25 pence on the London Stock Exchange on Friday.

A mine worker returns from the Lonmin mine at the end of his shift, outside Rustenburg October 5, 2015. Platinum producer Lonmin priced its $407 million rights issue at a 94 percent discount as the firm fights for survival in the face of depressed commodity prices after writing down $1.8 billion in assets. Picture taken October 5, 2015. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko
A mine worker returns from the Lonmin mine at the end of his shift, outside Rustenburg October 5, 2015. Platinum producer Lonmin priced its $407 million rights issue at a 94 percent discount as the firm fights for survival in the face of depressed commodity prices after writing down $1.8 billion in assets. Picture taken October 5, 2015. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko

The company had flagged the equity cash call would be issued at a “significant discount”. Its shares have tumbled 90 percent this year.

Read also: Swanepoel, shareholder, on the rise and fall of Lonmin: “that’s capitalism”

Battered by strikes, rising costs and weak platinum prices, Lonmin said last month it planned to raise the money and another $370 million in bank loans to refinance debt due in May 2016.

Lonmin has urged shareholders to approve the cash call at a meeting on Nov. 19, saying the injection was crucial to its survival.

The company said that if shareholders did not approve the rights issue, lenders would not provide the loans to push back the maturity of the 2016 debt to 2020.

Read also: Lonmin’s $770mn rescue plan: Cuts 6,000 jobs, $400mn in new shares

Lonmin said that South Africa’s Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which owns about 7 percent stake of the company, had committed to take up its full entitlement and has “sub-underwritten a material portion of the proposed rights issue in excess of its entitlement.”

Lonmin had to rely on an $800 million rights issue to shore up its battered balance sheet in November 2012.

Greenhill advised Lonmin on the rights issue, which was underwritten by HSBC, J.P. Morgan Cazenove and Standard Bank.

From MiningMX.com

David McKay | Wed, 04 Nov 2015

[miningmx.com] – LONMIN is expected to raise $400m through a rights offer, but analysts have reservations about the future sustainability of the firm which earlier this week impaired up to $2.05bn in assets.

They argue that the rights issue – the terms of which will be made public on November 9 – implies a platinum price forecast still way above the current spot price and once completed, it does not change the prospects of the company.

“We view the too little too late rights offer as only buying the company some time and perpetuating the company strategy, which has been to rely on the view that metals prices would rise,” said Leon Esterhuizen, an analyst with CIBC Capital Markets.

“Such a strategy simply places even bigger question marks around survivability if metals prices do not increase and, in our opinion, reflects poorly on management given an unwillingness to take tough decisions,” he said.

“They [Lonmin] are making the case that the company is worth $2bn versus the current market cap of $230m,” said a UK analyst who asked to remain anonymous.

“The prices used to calculate that value is most certainly above today’s spot [PGM] prices at which they still burn cash,” he said.”In the end, you are buying now because at least some of that $2bn is real and all the downside is priced in if you assume a 20 pence per share issue price. If the issue price is much lower than 20p, the game changes,” he added.

“My expectations is that the investment banks will put a proper discount on the rights issue and with the pre-warning of the equity issue, I can’t see that any exisiting shareholder would be surprised and not support,” said Hanré Rossouw of Investec Asset Management.

He added, however, that Lonmin’s production update on November 2 had eased some investor fears as it demonstrated he company was halfway through a retrenchment programme of 6,000 employees that would assist in reducing cash burn at current platinum group metal (PGM) prices.

Said another analyst: “I guess that there is always a chance it would fail, but shareholders are generally there because they believe … and so want to keep the belief alive. Bankers also generally underwrite”.

The expectation is that the Public Investment Corporation, the asset management firm owned by the South African government, will underwrite a significant portion of Lonmin far beyond its 7% investment.

At stake is some 35,669 souls employed by the company (as of Lonmin’s September 30 financial year-end. This is about 3,000 less than in September 2014, but it’s the most important reason why Lonmin cannot be allowed to fail.

Some though say saving the company will perpetuate market distress.In a strongly worded note on Lonmin’s proposed rights offer, Andrew Byrne, an analyst for Barclays Capital, urged investors not to take up the offer, suggesting that business ought to fail in order to restore the fortunes of the PGM market.

Set against Barclays Capital’s forecast of a platinum surplus until 2020, Byrne remarked: “Despite announcing major cost cutting and ore reserve harvesting plans, and capex deferrals, we calculate that without increases to the rand PGM basket, Lonmin will generate about $231m of negative free cashflow over the next three years in a ‘best case scenario’.

“More realistically, we expect the company to consume $575m and may need to raise further capital in 2018 in order to remain solvent. In light of this, we do not believe investors should follow their rights,” he said.

Analysts argue that the rights issue does not change the management or its strategy which was criticised previously by Esterhuizen as a case of “playing chicken with the market”; in other words, hoping gross revenue will improve.

“In our opinion, the company remains uninvestable and we find it hard to believe that there is no change to the board and/or the management structure given this significant value destruction,” he said.

GoHighLevel
gohighlevel gohighlevel login gohighlevel pricing gohighlevel crm gohighlevel api gohighlevel support gohighlevel review gohighlevel logo what is gohighlevel gohighlevel affiliate gohighlevel integrations gohighlevel features gohighlevel app gohighlevel reviews gohighlevel training gohighlevel snapshots gohighlevel zapier app gohighlevel gohighlevel alternatives gohighlevel pricegohighlevel pricing guidegohighlevel api gohighlevel officialgohighlevel plansgohighlevel Funnelsgohighlevel Free Trialgohighlevel SAASgohighlevel Websitesgohighlevel Experts