SAHPRA responds to EFF threats, unwarranted accusations

Statement on threats levelled at SA Health Products Regulatory Authority

We note with extreme concern the unwarranted accusations levelled against the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) recently, relating to its ongoing  evaluation of several vaccine candidates for approval in South Africa.

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) has recently alleged, without evidence, that SAHPRA  has “disallowed” registration of the Sputnik V and Sinovac (CoronaVac) vaccines because SAHPRA is “captured”, “controlled by the West’s pharmaceutical establishment”  and “used by politicians and major capitalist interests”.

This reckless rhetoric echoes similar attacks on the institution by parties such as AfriForum and special advocacy groups and lobbies unhappy with SAHPRA’s evidence-based  stance on ivermectin, alleging that the institution was “irresponsible”, “biased” and  abetting the “destruction of lives”.

On 18th June, the EFF demanded that SAHPRA finalises the approval of both these vaccines within seven days, failing which it threatens “militant” mass action against the regulator. The party has also reportedly levelled physical threats against SAHPRA personnel and members of its governing board, in a crude attempt to intimidate and bully an independent authority.

We condemn such behaviour and fully support the vital regulatory role that SAHPRA plays in ensuring that all medications and vaccines undergo rigorous examination to assess the  safety, efficacy and quality of products prior to them being registered or authorised for use  in the country.

It is in the interests of the public that SAHPRA is allowed to exercise its constitutional responsibility to ensure that only medicines where data addressing benefit against harm has been carefully weighed before being approved for use by the public.

It is essential that SAHPRA, as a statutory body, is insulated from untoward political  interference and protected from the threats that have recently been levelled against the  organisation and its members.

Safeguarding the integrity of a statutory body is a constitutional obligation of the  government, and any physical threats against its personnel or governing board members is  a law enforcement matter that should be taken up immediately by the relevant agencies.

We affirm the vital importance of SAHPRA’s important regulatory task and call on all  members of society who value the role of SAHPRA to refrain from all actions that serve to  undermine this function.


Wits University Faculty of Health Sciences –

South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) –

Southern African HIV Clinicians’ Society (SAHCS) –

Progressive Health Forum (PHF) –

South African Medical Association (SAMA) –

Infectious Diseases Society of South Africa (IDSSA) – members/idssa 

South African Antibiotic Stewardship Programme (SAASP) –

South African Academy of Family Physicians –

Gauteng General Practitioner Collaboration (GGPC) 

Public Health Association of South Africa (PHASA) –

Health Justice Initiative (HJI) – 

People’s Health Movement – South Africa (PHM-SA) –

Read more:

Visited 829 times, 2 visit(s) today