BRIC country hype is more that proof economic growth rates can’t predict market returns – SA asset manager

Who are these people who invest with the herd, buying shares when it is time to sell and selling when it is the best time to buy? It is people who are politically and socially correct when it comes to their investment portfolio and who are hypnotised by economic growth.
That certainly seems to have been the case when it comes to enthusiasm around the so-called BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) markets. As RE:CM chairman Piet Viljoen, one of South Africa’s most respected asset managers, demonstrates in this in-depth analysis of the popularity of BRIC investments, market excitement around the BRIC group of countries merely reflected what had already happened.
As it turns out, it wasn’t the best time to buy BRIC shares when South Africa was muscling its way into the club. However, now seems to be the time to start thinking about it.
Says Piet: “It appears that, from a combination of general neglect and a discount valuation, a buying opportunity in emerging market equities – and by implication also South African equities – could happen within the next couple of years.” 
If you want some insights into how a master value investor thinks, read on. Piet shares some of his number crunching in this article, published on Biznewz with his kind permission. – JC

South Africa Joins the BRICS – Was That a Buy Signal?

By Piet ViljoenPiet Viljoen

In January 2011 we wrote an article on South Africa’s inclusion in the BRICS (‘South Africa Joins the BRICS – a Buy Signal?’, RE:VIEW Volume 15). At the time, emerging markets were tremendously popular with investors – especially the so-called BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) markets. There was a lot of noise and excitement about South Africa joining this ‘select’ club of fast growing economies. Investors thought that such economic growth would possibly also presage fast growth in stock market prices as well.

However, what was actually happening – as with so many market fads – was that market excitement merely reflected what had already happened – a peek into the rear-view mirror, so to speak. The article included Table 1, reproduced below, that showed how well the stock markets of the BRIC countries and South Africa had performed in the preceding years.

Table 1: Emerging Market Returns to January 2011

RE-CM Table_1

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

We argued at the time that South Africa had benefitted from its status as an emerging market, but with a ‘twist’. After the emerging market crash of 1998 and during the tech boom that followed in 1999 no one wanted to know anything about emerging markets. These markets were at that time neglected, unloved and cheap. We argued that they benefitted in the decade that followed from the (not so) virtuous cycle of attracting more of the big global indexed – or quasi indexed – money the better they did.

The ‘twist’ part of the argument referred to the historical scarcity of capital in South Africa, due initially to sanctions and then to the desire of locals to move their capital abroad, almost at any cost. This meant that capital invested in South Africa had earned very high returns.

In the article, we said that we guessed that emerging markets would earn less going forward than the consensus believed as competition increased, driving down returns for all concerned.

What’s happened since then

Table 2 updates the figures in Table 1, showing returns from select emerging markets in the 10 years before admission to the BRICS club (from Table 1) and comparing these to the three years ending August 2013.

Table 2: Emerging Market Returns

RE-CM table 2

Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream

It’s clear that the excitement in 2010 around these markets was informed mainly by what had happened in the previous 10 years and had no predictive power. Emerging markets have underperformed developed markets substantially over the past three years. Interestingly, despite being the slowest growing economy among the BRICS markets, South Africa recorded the best market returns. More proof that there’s little correlation between economic growth and market returns.

Valuation is a better predictor of returns than economic activity

If economic growth rates can’t be used to predict market returns, what can? We’ve found over time that valuation matters much more than economic activity when determining future returns. By 2010, emerging markets were trading at a premium to developed markets on a Price-to-Book (P/B) basis. Chart 1 below was published in the original article and has been updated. Of course, the corporate governance, juristic and political environments of emerging markets relative to developed markets has historically justified a discounted rating. So when emerging markets started trading at a premium in the period 2008 to 2010, alarm bells started to ring for value investors such as ourselves. The returns over the past three years in Table 2 therefore came as no surprise.

Today, emerging markets once again trade at a (justified) discount to developed markets. However, given that the discount isn’t yet extreme, we’re still not as excited about prospective investment returns from these markets as we were in the early part of the century.

Chart 1: Emerging Markets Premium to Global Equity Price-to-Book Value

RE-CM Chart_1

Source: Financial Times, Deutsche Bank

What does pique our interest however, is the level of neglect among global investors of emerging markets. Charts 2 and 3 on the following page show how underweight investors are in emerging markets generally, and South Africa specifically. This is a major sea change from three years ago when the article was written. It appears that, from a combination of general neglect and a discount valuation, a buying opportunity in emerging market equities – and by implication also South African equities – could happen within the next couple of years.

Chart 2: September 2013 Global Asset Class Positioning Relative to History

RE-CM chart 2

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey

Chart 3: Global Emerging Market Investors’ Country and Sector Preferences

RE-CM chart 3

Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey

What we learned

Don’t confuse excitement about a particular market sector or region with a good investment opportunity. There’s normally a strong inverse correlation between the level of excitement and the level of prospective returns of any prospective investment.
In fact, excitement is normally based on historic returns. Over time, returns tend to regress to the average, so particularly strong periods are generally followed by weak periods. Investors who recognise this will save themselves a lot of pain.
Long term stock market returns have almost nothing to do with economic growth rates and everything to do with valuation levels.

Piet Viljoen

Visited 49 times, 1 visit(s) today