Key topics:
- Barrick Gold settled a $5.5bn tax dispute with Mali for $438m.
- Sahel nations push for higher mining revenues, favoring Russia and China.
- Mali’s tough policies risk long-term damage to its mining economy.
Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.
Support South Africa’s bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.
If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up for the BizNews channel here.
From The Economist, published under licence. The original article can be found on www.economist.com
© 2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved.
The Economist ___STEADY_PAYWALL___
Mining multinationals are learning to do business with juntas
The Boss of Barrick Gold, a Canadian mega-miner and the world’s second-largest gold producer, is no stranger to bust-ups with African governments. In an interview with The Economist at a big annual African mining conference in Cape Town this month, Mark Bristow recalled past wrangles with leaders in Tanzania and Congo like a retiring boxer remembering old bouts. He shrugged off an arrest warrant, issued by the government of Mali in December and accusing him of money-laundering and violating financial regulation (allegations he denies), as the cost of doing business in exceptionally tough places. “Mining is a long-term game,” says Mr Bristow. “The best way to resolve misunderstandings or disagreements is through dialogue.”
His optimism seems to have paid off. On February 19th Reuters reported that Barrick and Mali had agreed to end a dispute that had lasted almost two years and led to the suspension of mining operations accounting for between 5% and 10% of the country’s GDP. The Malian government, which accuses Barrick of unpaid dues and unspecified social and environmental harms, had demanded $500m in back taxes—a sum the finance ministry recently bumped up to a whopping $5.5bn. According to the new agreement, Barrick will pay $438m. In return, the government is to release four senior local employees in prison on charges of money-laundering and financing terrorism. It will also return hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of gold ore, which the state began seizing late last year.
The saga, however amicable its conclusion, illustrates the growing challenges facing Western miners in the region. African governments from Ivory Coast to Zambia are revising mining codes in pursuit of higher rents and bigger ownership stakes. They have been prompted by surging global demand for minerals ranging from gold—the price of which is at an all-time high—to copper and lithium, which are critical for the green transition. Nowhere is the trend towards resource nationalism more advanced than in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, the heart of Africa’s “coup belt” and a zone increasingly aligned with Russia and hostile to the West. These Sahelian states are among the continent’s most mineral-rich, especially in gold and uranium. But because of the capricious and heavy-handed approach their military governments have taken to pressuring foreign investors, the Sahel is also where the nationalistic turn is most likely to backfire.
Mali’s junta, which took power in 2020, is the pioneer of the group. A state-commissioned audit of the mining sector, which Mr Bristow brushes off as “incorrect”, claimed the government was missing out on revenues of nearly $1bn. The revised mining code, introduced in 2023, removed tax and customs exemptions and increased the share of a project the state can own from 10% to 30%. Controversially, the junta insisted on applying it retroactively to existing operations, rather than just future ones. To enforce compliance, it has “incrementally increased demands and procedural pressure”, notes Beverly Ochieng of Control Risks, a consultancy. Even before the deal with Barrick, Mali had received or been promised over $635m in additional tax payments, according to Reuters. Australia’s Resolute Mining agreed to pay $160m in late 2024 after its chief executive was detained for more than a week.
Mali’s neighbours have taken note. Last year Niger’s government cancelled the mining licence held by Orano, a French state-owned nuclear-fuel company. In the face of legal proceedings it has blocked uranium exports and promised to return the mines “to the public domain of the state”. The government of Burkina Faso, although generally less hostile towards Western investors, has nationalised two mines and seized gold extracted by a Canadian firm in the name of “public necessity”. Sarama Resources, an Australia-based gold miner, has embarked on an arbitration battle in protest against the withdrawal of one of its exploration permits.
Some fret that the three juntas are motivated primarily by hostility to the West. In the past few years the trio have all expelled Western—primarily French—troops, and hired Russian mercenaries to help them fight jihadists instead. Niger’s showdown with Orano, in particular, is clearly driven by such geopolitical considerations. But in Mali and Burkina Faso as well, countries like Russia, China and Turkey stand to benefit from the new orientation. “We see partners being preferred on the basis of nationality,” complains a Western diplomat in Bamoko. In December Ganfeng Lithium, China’s largest lithium producer, opened a giant mine in southern Mali. “The Russians and Chinese are stepping in. Who is losing?” asks Moussa Kondo of the Sahel Institute, a Malian think-tank.
But there are limits to the geopolitical shift. Of the three countries only Burkina Faso currently has a Russian-owned industrial mine. “I don’t think they actually want to break the relationship with Western multinationals,” argues Ulf Laessing of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Bamako.
Indeed, money seems to be more important than ideology. Wracked by insecurity, the economies of all three states are in the doldrums. Four mines in Burkina Faso have closed since the military took power in 2022. Mali’s junta is reportedly struggling to pay for the services of Wagner Group, the Russian mercenary outfit it hired in 2021. The quest for more revenue is not limited to Western miners. This month the government began taxing phone calls and mobile-money transactions. Last year it made Maroc Telecom pay a fee of $272m to have its licence renewed.
Local businesspeople in Bamako complain about increasingly onerous tax demands. “Everything has gone up,” grumbles Yusuf Diarra, a water-tank salesman. The shakedown of foreign companies, by contrast, appears broadly popular. Even Malians critical of the junta agree that previous mining codes were too generous to miners. “Changing the 2019 code took guts, and had to be done,” says Modibo Mao Makalou, a prominent local economist.
But the way the government has gone about it seems likely to jeopardise Mali’s economy in the long run. Annual gold production fell by nearly a quarter in 2024, according to the country’s mines ministry. Even if big miners like Barrick—one of the country’s largest private employers— stay put in Mali, they may think twice before committing more capital. Robex Resources, another Canadian firm, already plans to sell its gold mine. “Mining is by far the foundation of that economy, and you can destroy it in a heartbeat,” Mr Bristow warns.
For now few Western mining firms are rushing to leave the Sahel. In Burkina Faso three large Canadian miners report cordial relationships with the junta.Though Niger’s government withdrew a permit from a Canadian uranium producer last year for failing to develop its assets, another remains unscathed. Mr Bristow suggests Barrick would refuse any demands which might threaten the economic viability of its projects in Mali. But he also says he is “very happy to search for ways for the state to get more of the [tax] take”. For all the discord, governments and mining companies still have powerful incentives to get along.
Read also:
