Pancreatic cancer is notoriously difficult to treat, with a five-year survival rate of just 12%. A small study of a pancreatic cancer vaccine has given researchers hope that it might be possible to train immune cells to see and destroy even devastating cancers like pancreatic cancer. This article by Bloomberg’s Lisa Jarvis discusses the results of this small study conducted by oncologists at Memorial Sloan Kettering in collaboration with BioNTech in Germany. Among several promising findings, the study revealed the potential for quick-turnaround personalized vaccines tailored to a patient’s own tumour and that an mRNA vaccine can elicit an immune response even in people with a cancer with few mutations. While there are caveats to consider, the article concludes with a sense of hope that these studies may contribute to a meaningful change in the survival statistics of pancreatic cancer. – Nadya Swart
There’s fresh hope on one of the toughest cancers to cure: Lisa Jarvis
By Lisa Jarvis Â
Results from a small study of a pancreatic vaccine are promising enough to merit cautious optimism. Researchers are figuring out how to train immune cells to see and destroy cancers — even devastating ones like pancreatic cancer.
Any progress against pancreatic cancer should be lauded. But the vaccine still has a lot to prove before reaching the market. And even if it gets there, it can only (for now) help a small slice of pancreatic cancer patients.
No matter its long-term success, though, the study is important for its lessons about how to target pancreatic cancer — and what it says about the potential to use the immune system to battle more types of tumours.Â
Read more: The manifestations of fear in South Africa: Nicky Falkof on her book Worrier State.
In the study, led by oncologists at Memorial Sloan Kettering who teamed up with BioNTech in Germany, 16 people with pancreatic cancer were given the vaccine alongside chemotherapy. The vaccine prompted an immune response in half of the patients. After 18 months, none of them showed signs of disease recurrence.
That such a small study has generated so much excitement reflects this cancer’s notoriety. While early detection, lifestyle interventions and better treatments have helped people with other cancers live longer, the five-year survival rate for someone diagnosed with pancreatic cancer is just 12%. By 2030, pancreatic cancer is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, surpassed only by lung cancer.  Â
Read more: Palliative care as a human right: COVID ICU Project unveils groundbreaking approach
Because pancreatic cancer tends to be so swift, one big lesson from this study is simply that it’s possible to create a vaccine quickly enough to make a difference. Much like Moderna and Merck’s cancer vaccine, which recently generated excitement for its potential to prevent melanoma from returning, these shots are tailored to a patient’s own tumour. Memorial Sloan Kettering researchers sent samples to BioNTech in Germany, where the tumour was analysed to determine which mutations might elicit a helpful immune response. The recipe for up to 20 of those proteins was encoded in a personalised mRNA vaccine that was mailed back to the oncologists.
Technology — inexpensive and rapid genome sequencing, AI, and mRNA — made it possible for patients to get their first doses in about nine weeks after their surgery.
The trial’s other big lesson is that an mRNA vaccine can elicit an immune response even in people with a cancer with few mutations. Until now, the conventional wisdom with cancer vaccines is that they will work best, and perhaps only work, in tumours with lots of mutations (like melanoma). That’s because the vaccine trains the immune cells to spot what’s different about cancer cells — mutated proteins — so they will mobilise to destroy them. Â
Yet this vaccine created a robust immune response even though pancreatic cancers have few mutations, says Vinod P. Balachandran, the pancreatic cancer surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who led the study. That finding could signal broader applicability of personalised cancer vaccines.
There is an important caveat, though: Because a biopsy doesn’t give researchers enough material to analyse, this bespoke vaccine can only be created for patients who are able to undergo surgery to remove their tumours. That’s, at most, about 20% of the pancreatic cancer population. That’s also the population that has the best chances of responding to a vaccine.
Decades ago, researchers were trying to use therapeutic cancer vaccines in people with advanced diseases. At that stage, not only is cancer a problem, but patients, in particular pancreatic cancer patients, have a host of other health issues that dampen the immune response. Trying to rev up those T-cells in that scenario with a vaccine alone is like trying to roll a boulder uphill, says Anirban Maitra, a pancreatic cancer specialist at MD Anderson in Houston. After surgery, the immune system is going up against a much more manageable enemy.
The Memorial Sloan Kettering researchers demonstrated how well that could work. After vaccination, one patient developed a suspicious lesion in the liver that harboured a mutation found in the pancreatic tumour, suggesting the disease had spread. Tests and images showed vaccine-trained immune cells crowding to the site. Later, the lesion disappeared. “That’s exactly what the vaccine is supposed to do,” Maitra says. Â
While this vaccine (and others in development) wind through clinical trials, the field should be throwing everything into figuring out how to ensure more patients can benefit from it. That will mean diagnosing pancreatic cancer earlier. Some 80% of pancreatic cancers are discovered after tumours have already spread to other organs, a point where most patients can’t undergo surgery and their chances of surviving the disease are vanishingly small.
But here, too, there’s good news. In another promising study last week, researchers used artificial intelligence to analyse the medical records of millions of patients from Denmark and the US, including nearly 28,000 who developed pancreatic cancer. By looking across decades of data, the group identified a cluster of symptoms that could be early signs of cancer nearly a year before it was diagnosed in real life. Ideally, this information could be used by doctors to identify and monitor patients at risk of developing the disease, allowing many to undergo surgery and treatment before tumours have spread.
The caveats to these studies are many. But there is finally real hope that the bleak survival statistics for pancreatic cancer could meaningfully change.
