Zuma’s support bumbles. Mbete’s advocate says Parly got Nkandla ‘wrong’

The day President Jacob Zuma said he’d pay back the Nkandla money is the day all those who’d supported him internally in this matter must have felt in some way betrayed. The amount of support Zuma received from those close to him and in Parliament, when he was being attacked from all sides, was insurmountable. And as the admission of guilt was received, so all those who’d blindly supported him were covered with the same blanket. And when the house isn’t built on truth and trust, all it takes is for one of the bricks to be displaced for it to fall down. This was hugely evident in the Constitutional Court yesterday as National Assembly Speaker Baleka Mbete’s lawyer Lindi Nkosi-Thomas bumbled through her testimony, eventually admitting that they’d handled the Nkandla matter ‘wrong’. Their job was to hold President Zuma account for any potential wrong doing. But as quickly as President Zuma turned his back on those who’d supported him through the more than 2 000 days, so the roles may be reversed. – Stuart Lowman

By Lizeka Tandwa and Amanda Khoza, News24

Johannesburg – National Assembly Speaker Baleka Mbete‘s lawyer Lindi Nkosi-Thomas gained instant fame on social media after she fumbled through her submissions in the Nkandla matter in the Constitutional Court on Tuesday.

She raised her voice, used dramatic hand gestures, and occasionally stood in silence before the judges after they asked her questions.

Constitutional_Court_of_South Africa-entrance-20070622
Constitutional Court of South Africa entrance

Her demeanour and comments even amused Public Protector Thuli Madonsela who laughed when Nkosi-Thomas made a comment about her powers.

Nkosi-Thomas was asked if the National Assembly had erred in how it approached the remedial action recommended by Madonsela in her report on the upgrades to President Jacob Zuma’s Nkandla homestead.

“Did the National Assembly fail to exercise oversight of the president as a member of executive?” Justice Edwin Cameron asked.

After mumbling, Nkosi-Thomas conceded, “Parliament took a wrong position.”

Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke sought clarity from her.

“Did the National Assembly err in the manner in which it approached the remedial action taken by the Public Protector in the view that accountability kicks in on the side of the executive? Or are you leaving the matter in our hands?” he asked.

“I haven’t been instructed on that issue,” she responded.

At one stage the overwhelmed advocate told the justices: “That’s the way it goes”.

During one of Nkosi-Thomas impassioned submissions, one of the justices asked her for clarity.

Before the justice had finished his question, Nkosi-Thomas began answering him. Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng reprimanded her.

“I am sorry council. Here we speak one person at a time. Just wait for my colleagues to submit their questions and then take your time to respond. Again only respectfully please.”

Nkosi-Thomas said Madonsela could not dictate to Parliament what to do. She said enforcing her remedial action without scrutiny would amount to dictatorship.

As Nkosi-Thomas stood before the justices, gesticulating and stammering, she dominated the discussion on social media.

Political analyst Eusebius MacKaiser tweeted: “Advocate Nkosi-Thomas is behaving like an ANC backbench MP hoping to shout her way into an ambassadorial posting NGOKU!”.

Puppet Chester Missing, the voice of comedian Conrad Koch, said: “Baleka Mbete be like ‘honourable lawyer, I do not recognise you’.”

Melody Molale said Nkosi-Thomas needed a hug.

The News Guy said she reminded him of not having the answer to a teacher’s question at school.

A tweeter called Brown said: “Nkosi Thomas going to report to her employers like…” along with a picture of a crying infant at the wheel of a BMW.

According to a LinkedIn page for “Lindi Nkosi-Thomas SC”, she had acted as a judge of the High Court of South Africa on numerous occasions.

The EFF, DA, and Public Protector Thuli Madonsela want to the Constitutional Court to clarify the nature and extent of the chapter nine institution’s powers to take remedial action.

They argued that Zuma failed to comply with Madonsela’s findings that he unduly benefitted from security upgrades to his Nkandla homestead in KwaZulu-Natal, and failed to act on her recommendation that he had to pay back a portion of the R246 million in taxpayers’ money used.

They wanted the court to make an order compelling him to do so.

Judgment was reserved. – News24

Source: http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/mbetes-bumbling-advocate-admits-parly-was-wrong-in-nkandla-matter-20160209

Visited 113 times, 1 visit(s) today