Key topics
- Trump targets DEI policies, triggering corporate and government reversals.
- Lawsuits and executive orders fuel the anti-DEI movement in workplaces.
- Companies rebrand DEI efforts to navigate shifting political landscapes.
Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.
The seventh BizNews Conference, BNC#7, is to be held in Hermanus from March 11 to 13, 2025. The 2025 BizNews Conference is designed to provide an excellent opportunity for members of the BizNews community to interact directly with the keynote speakers, old (and new) friends from previous BNC events â and to interact with members of the BizNews team. Register for BNC#7 here.
If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up for the BizNews channel here.
From The Economist, published under licence. The original article can be found on www.economist.com
© 2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved.
The Economist ___STEADY_PAYWALL___
Donald Trumpâs attacks on DEI are causing huge headaches for bosses
I am a woman of colour. I am a mom. I am a cis-gender millennial who has been diagnosed with generalised anxiety disorder. I am intersectional.â She was also a spook. Her mission: advertising a career at the CIA. The time? 2021. The place? President Joe Bidenâs America.
The American workplace was remade after the death of George Floyd in May 2020. A policeman was convicted of his murder. There were riots. In the heat, the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) were extolled in government and across corporate America. Unconscious-bias training and email-signature pronouns became features of office life. All manner of flags were hoisted. Active discrimination was encouraged through hiring practices that often penalised white men. Political correctness went mad like never before.
That vast project is crumbling. President Donald Trump has promised a ârevolution of common senseâ. Americaâs federal bureaucracy is his main target, and those in DEI-related jobs are the bullseye. Last year the State Department employed a staff of 13 in its âoffice of diversity and inclusionâ; $2.9m was earmarked for diversity training. Now, under secretary of state Marco Rubio, staffers have reportedly been told to declare diversity initiatives to â[email protected]â (the âAâ stands for accessibility). Finished, too, are plum contracts for consulting firms. Since 2020, for instance, Deloitte had won more than $12m in DEI-related work from the Department of Health and Human Services.
In corporate America the backlash against DEI began well before Mr Trump arrived in Washington. After the Supreme Court ended affirmative action in university admissions in June 2023, a barrage of lawsuits were filed against companies. âWe sued international law firms over their internship programmes. We sued venture-capital firms. We sued the Smithsonian Museum. We sued Southwest Airlines. I canât even remember all of them,â says Edward Blum, who brought the university-admissions case. A second front was opening up online. âWeâve been fighting this fight for five years, and weâve faced immense opposition,â says Christopher Rufo, an influential conservative activist who has written extensively against corporate DEI policies.
Mr Trumpâs victory in November accelerated the reversal. Some of Americaâs biggest firms, including Amazon and Walmart, have since scrapped DEI initiatives. The most severe whiplash is in tech. You can listen to it on Spotify. On one podcast Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist, scolded BlackRock, the worldâs biggest asset manager, for forcing âretardedâ social policies on companies it invests in. Mark Zuckerberg went on Joe Roganâs show to decry the lack of âmasculine energyâ in the modern workplace. (Somebody ought to notify State Street, a fund manager whose gender-diversity-focused fund has Meta as its top holding.)
What remains of the DEI movement is being swiftly rebadged. In January McDonaldâs said it would abandon its workforce demographic goals. The fast-food chainâs âdiversity teamâ has become its âinclusion teamâ. At Target, âsupplier diversityâ is out; âsupplier engagementâ is in. The retailer says it wants to stay âin step with the evolving external landscapeâ.
Firms retaining DEI policies are likely to have change forced upon them. Anti-DEI executive orders appeared immediately after Mr Trumpâs inauguration. One revoked civil-rights era rules that required extensive demographic-data collection by firms doing business with the government (that includes many big public companies). The burden of the old rules should not be understated. âI have seen many companies decline government contracts just because of the costs of compliance,â says Bob Lian of Akin Gump, a law firm.
Deals with the state will now require companies to take a vow of abstinence from âprogrammes promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination lawsâ. But DEI is a broad bag of concepts. Its ambiguity has so far been to the advantage of its supporters: one manâs discriminatory pursuit of diversity is anotherâs agenda for inclusion. Mr Trump is fighting vague management speak with vaguer legalese. When bosses âdonât know what the government and the courtâs view will be of which programmes are lawfulâ they will be much more careful, says Jason Schwartz of Gibson Dunn, another law firm.
It is having the intended effect. Bosses are seeking counsel on whether workplace âaffinity groupsâ, for example, are legal. Is it worth a court case to find out? âSome of the mechanisms in the executive order are clearly designed to generate private litigation,â says Ishan Bhabha of Jenner & Block, another law firm. America First Legal, one of the most litigious groups in recent years, was founded by Stephen Miller, now Mr Trumpâs deputy chief of staff. âThe people leading the activist groups now have the machinery of the federal government behind them,â says Mr Schwartz.
Federal agencies have also been tasked with naming and shaming institutions they deem the worst DEI offenders, including public companies. In government, that is unprecedented. But in the online MAGA world, public shaming has proved to be a powerful tool. âI expect the investigations to yield a treasure trove of excess, illegality and insanity, all driven by left wing ideologies,â says Mr Rufo.
Checkout
When DEI was ascendant, bosses thought of themselves as statesmen solving social problems more effectively than governments. Many now blame the hubris of that period on paying too much attention to the demands of young employees. The reality is more complicated. Firms committed themselves to embracing their âstakeholdersâ when there was consensus among elites about the benefits of DEI. That consensus has shattered. With Mr Trump in the White House, the fallout is likely to get more painful still.
Costco offers a cautionary tale. Unlike Target, the retailer has not released a statement disavowing its commitment to DEI. It told shareholders to reject a resolution from a conservative group which would force a review of its DEI policies. They did; such resolutions hardly ever get much support. The left wrongly interpreted this as a full-throated commitment to DEI: Al Sharpton, a black preacher, strolled its aisles in support. The rightâjust as inaccuratelyâsaw the move as a defiant challenge to Mr Trumpâs war on DEI. Attorneys general from 19 red states wrote a letter chastising the firm. Promises of boycotts swirled online. When selling a hotdog and soda for $1.50 canât unite Americans, perhaps nothing can.
Read also:
