FT: A world divided – ‘rules-based’ order vs ‘multipolar’ vision

The global geopolitical landscape is currently marked by a clash of visions between the West, emphasising the "rules-based international order" (RBIO), and Russia and China, advocating for a "multipolar" world. The RBIO, championed by the US and allies, promotes peace, respect for international law, and protection of democratic norms. In contrast, Russia and China argue that the decline of US power is necessary for a more just world with multiple centres of influence. The conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and the South China Sea reflect this ideological struggle, with each side interpreting events to shape the narrative and influence the world order. The ongoing tensions highlight the complexity of global relations, where nations align based on their interests and values, with the potential re-election of Donald Trump posing a significant unknown for the future of the RBIO.

Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.

By Gideon Rachman

What do the words mean and why do they matter? It depends on which side you ask

In the battle for global influence, all sides have their jargon. The US and allies talk of the "rules-based international order" (RBIO). Russia and China prefer a "multipolar" world. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, India's astute foreign minister, recently split the difference by talking about the need for a "multilateral rules-based international order".

___STEADY_PAYWALL___