DUBLIN — As more and more details of Boeing safety missteps emerge, the company looks more and more culpable. In the article below, the WSJ uncovers how Boeing failed to share its knowledge about problems with a cockpit safety alert for a year before the Lion Air crash in Indonesia. It is increasingly hard to believe Boeing’s ongoing denial of any responsibility for the two crashes that cost hundreds of lives. While the company may not have been criminally culpable, it seems clear that it has been negligent and dishonest about the 737 MAX 8’s safety issues. Pertinent information about known problems was withheld from regulators and airlines. Traditional safety processes weren’t followed during the plane’s development. Pilot training was neglected. And key safety features were offered as optional and expensive extras rather than as part of a standard purchase. There are a number of lawsuits brewing on behalf of the families of those killed in the 737 crashes. Once we get to the discovery phase of those trials, we’ll no doubt see even more alarming information emerge. Boeing would do much better to come totally clean about what happened and to engage its stakeholders in an honest and productive discussion about how to prevent similar disasters in the future. No one is buying the party line at this point. – Felicity Duncan

Boeing knew about safety-alert problem for a year before telling FAA, airlines

By Andy Pasztor, Andrew Tangel and Alison Sider

(The Wall Street Journal) Boeing Co. didn’t share information about a problem with a cockpit safety alert for about a year before the issue drew attention with the October crash of a 737 MAX jet in Indonesia, and then gave some airlines and pilots partial and inconsistent explanations, according to industry and government officials.
___STEADY_PAYWALL___

It was only after a second MAX accident in Ethiopia nearly five months later, these officials said, that Boeing became more forthcoming with airlines about the problem. And the company didn’t publicly disclose the software error behind the problem for another six weeks, in the interim leaving the flying public and, according to a Federal Aviation Administration spokesman, the agency’s acting chief unaware.

The length of time between when Boeing realised the problem and when it shared that information hasn’t been previously reported. The problem kept a safety feature found on earlier models from functioning on the MAX, though it isn’t clear if the feature would have prevented either crash.

Senior FAA and airline officials increasingly are raising questions about how transparent the Chicago aerospace giant has been regarding problems with the cockpit warnings, according to people familiar with their thinking.

The growing scrutiny could pose new challenges to Boeing’s efforts to shore up confidence in the 737 MAX, solicit regulatory support around the globe and get the MAX fleet, grounded after the second crash, flying again.

Meanwhile, as part of a criminal probe into whether Boeing misled regulators or customers, investigators as recently as last week were asking questions about how the MAX jets gained approval for flight and about Boeing officials involved in the process.

On Sunday, Boeing said company engineers in 2017 identified that the alerts weren’t operating as intended due to a software error. Boeing said that at the time it relied on standard internal procedures and conducted an internal review by engineers and managers that determined that the problem didn’t “adversely impact airplane safety or operation.” Senior Boeing leaders didn’t learn about the issue until after the Oct. 29, 2018, Lion Air crash, the company said.

The conclusions were shared with midlevel FAA officials after the Lion Air crash, according to Boeing and the FAA. An FAA spokesman said midlevel agency officials analysed the issue of the inoperable alerts from November 2018 to February, and concluded emergency action wasn’t required.

Boeing, according to industry and government officials, told different airlines months apart from one another that the cockpit alerts – intended to warn pilots about certain sensor malfunctions – didn’t work on most of the global MAX fleet as originally designed, due to a software error. The same feature – called angle-of-attack disagree alerts – is to be made standard on all 737 MAX jets as part of an impending software fix aimed at getting the grounded fleet back in the air. The alerts warn pilots if sensors measuring the angle of a plane’s nose are sending errant data.

Such alerts offer an extra safeguard for pilots in the event a separate stall-prevention system called MCAS misfires, a situation that led to the Lion Air crash and the March crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet. The crashes took a total of 346 lives. It isn’t clear whether functioning alerts, supplemental to the MCAS system, would have made a difference in either accident.

At the company’s annual shareholder meeting on April 29, Chief Executive Dennis Muilenburg said the company was focused on safety and that the plane maker would look for ways to improve how it develops airplanes.

Mr. Muilenburg said later that the alerts “will be standard on all the 737 MAXs,” hours before the plane maker disclosed it had actually intended the safety features to be standard.

Boeing said it realised the alerts weren’t operating several months after the first deliveries of the model, which was certified to carry passengers in March 2017.

On Friday, a spokeswoman for Southwest Airlines Co. , the largest MAX customer, said Boeing told the carrier about the inoperative alerts after the Lion Air crash. Southwest learned about the problem with the alerts by late November, and began installing additional cockpit indicators late last year.

Over the weekend, a spokesman for United Continental Holdings Inc., another major MAX operator, said Boeing first told the airline about the software error toward the end of March, four months later than Southwest, in the wake of the Ethiopia crash, which took 157 lives. United had believed the alerts were part of an optional package it declined, before eventually learning its MAX aircraft actually had the feature but it wasn’t working, the carrier’s spokesman said.

WestJet, a Canadian carrier, has said it wanted its 13 MAXs to have the warning for when the two angle-of-attack sensors disagree, just as its older 737s do. A spokesperson for the carrier said Saturday the airline learned about an issue with the alerts “earlier this year with further clarifications in the months after.”

A House Transportation Committee investigation, among other things, is looking into why the FAA and Boeing didn’t publicly disseminate information about the nonfunctioning sensors, according to people familiar with the matter.

Meanwhile, questioning continues in the federal criminal investigation into the suspect MCAS system, and how the jetliner was certified.

As recently as last week, two prosecutors and federal special agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Transportation inspector general’s office interviewed a former Boeing employee and asked broad questions about the manner in which the suspect flight-control system was developed, according to a person familiar with the meeting.

During the interview, which was conducted near Boeing’s facilities in Everett, Wash., the prosecutors and agents asked questions about how the system underwent official technical reviews covering potential hazards, this person said. Prosecutors and agents asked about specific Boeing executives and pilots involved in the MAX program, this person said, adding that investigators appeared to have already gathered at least one internal Boeing email.

An FAA spokesman said the agency was set to issue a world-wide special safety information bulletin when the Ethiopian crash intervened and the planes were grounded. Boeing’s statement confirmed that it worked with the FAA to develop a plan to resolve the alert problem as part of a broader software fix.

The FAA also said that Daniel Elwell, the agency’s acting chief, didn’t learn about the inoperative alerts until The Wall Street Journal published an article on the topic April 28. The agency is reviewing its procedures for sharing information among various levels of management, as well as about safety evaluations of new models, the spokesman said.

Some senior FAA officials expressed concern that Boeing didn’t directly make them aware of the problem sooner, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Boeing didn’t publicly disclose that the alerts didn’t work until the next day, when it released a statement indicating “the feature was not activated as intended.”

For its part, the FAA said that “timely or earlier communication with the operators would have helped to reduce or eliminate possible confusion.”

– Write to Andy Pasztor at [email protected], Andrew Tangel at [email protected] and Alison Sider at [email protected]