In the latest episode of Rational Radio, SA’s favourite market commentator shakes his proverbial head at the excellent value offered by industrial companies listed on the JSE, pointing out some of the obvious bargains. While Shapiro will be doing his homework on exciting new plays like the JSE’s first Cannabis stock Labat Africa, he’s excited about the medium-term upside potential of blue chip shares that have been hammered by Mr Market’s Coronavirus reaction. Fascinating insights and fresh investment ideas – as always. – Alec Hogg
Alec, the market value of Hulett is R400m.
___STEADY_PAYWALL___
Tongaat Hulett. Really? Theyâre down to that?Â
Yes. In other words, thatâs what the marketâs valuing it at. With all those rolling lands and exactly as Dave said, all those processing units, ArcelorMittal was valued at R100bn maybe a few years ago. Itâs down to R1bn now. So, you can buy all those steel mills for R1bn. Itâs mad.
You can buy Newcastle for R1bn.
Well, you know it. If anybody knows how the processing, the plant involved and what a steel mill isâŚ
I was an operator in a steel mill for one long â very long â university vac.Â
And so, I think those real assets in South Africa are just being chucked away and valued at absolutely nothing.
Would you have a go at Labat Africa?
I would look at it. Oh, absolutely.
Because if they get it right, thereâs cannabis.
There are a couple, cannabis and the other one is plant food, where companies are developing plant food â new substitutes. Yes, itâs a wonderful theme. I handle other peoplesâ money so I have to be very careful with it. I canât just be frivolous and take gambles with it but we look at those and we study them very carefully. So, Iâm excited about where weâre going and where the worldâs going in the next couple of years.
Dave, you mentioned Tongaat Hulett. I did talk at the top of the show to Dave Woollam about the sale of the starch operations â R5.25bn roughly a half of the R13bn in debt, so theyâre going to halve that but it seems to be a company thatâs still struggling to find its way out of the problems that itâs in.
Absolutely, and thatâs why you can buy the company for R400m-odd. How theyâre going to make the other R8bnâŚtheyâve got the land but no-one wants to buy the land at the moment and if you can do what Brian says â start converting itâŚ
Take the sugar and put it into cannabis.
Or something like that.Â
Just think of that. Wow.
Itâs something to look at. There might be other products that they can grow that would have a worldwide acceptance⌠This is land and its beautiful land. You know that area far better than I do. This is KZN.
Cannabis grows when you spit the pips out as you saw at Melrose Arch. It grows double in KZN and even better in MpumalangaâŚ
And if heâs got the processing and he gets a head start on everybody and can process this and turn it into whatever product they need, thereâs an industry. You know, you can create industries. In this country, weâve got to be innovative.
An industry that has done well for two players but not for the third, is mobile phones. Cell C is still having its problems. I see that Blue Labelâs result were just out. Now, theyâre talking about selling water â measuring metres for water. Why in heavenâs name did they go into Cell C in the first place?Â
I asked them that question and I think they were badly advised and perhaps overrating their own capabilities and I say that in a nice way. Where other people had failed, I donât know what they thought they had. In fact, I had a conversation because having monitored what was happening in other markets⌠If you look at the US, itâs down to three operators. Sprint is just gone. I think youâve got T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon. Thatâs it. The whole of the United States. Why would you have four to five here? Leave it to MTN and leave it to Vodacom, maybe Telkom can find a small space in that but they wrote off R5.5bn-plus in two years. I mean, thatâs a massive destruction of wealth.
How do they keep their jobs â the Levy brothers?
I donât know.Â
Itâs not a rhetorical question. Itâs more of âdo they have the equity that ensures that they control the companyâ so that they keep the company or would it be the board that says, âSorry. One mistake. Itâs okay.â
Well, I think the boardâs responsible for that mistake as well. So, itâs the same board that canât fire itself but as an outside investor, Iâm surprised that no-oneâs actually asked that question. How do you write offâŚ? When Peter Matlare wrote of R2bn-odd for Tiger Brands in Nigeria, he didnât last long after that and so it goes. A lot of other managers, having written off massive amounts are shown the door. In America, itâs almost immediate. So, how people hold their jobs like this? Itâs going to take a long time for them to get their credibility back. People are going to question what theyâre doing and I suppose itâs a veryâŚwhat do you call it? Itâs like a club and they still probably attractâŚ
A bar mitzvah club?
It could be.
Isnât that what they used to call it?
I have to tell you in a nice way because youâll appreciate it. When they went into the deal and Iâd made a comment on TV, they phoned me back and I said, âBrett, Mark, the shuls need you donât lose this moneyâ because they are very magnanimous. They are very, very charitable chaps and I think they kept⌠They did a lot of good work with the money when they had it and I said âdonât lose itâ, which unfortunately, has happened.
Well, Tongaat have also lost it and today, we saw the RCL entrants and it was interesting to see that their sugar is a gross part of their business whereas in Tongaat, theyâre very concerned about it pulling them further down. I donât know if you had a chance to look at RCL.
I havenât but this came out of the Remgro stage – Rainbow Chickens and that. I have to look at that. Itâs also been battered recently and that. I donât know. Thatâs another story. Where does Remgro go? Some of these old businesses that we built our reputations on, that we used to follow so closely, have just kind of gone nowhere and I donât know whether this generation has gotten too old. I think they all need to re-look at their business models.
Well, the numbers are confusing again because headline earnings are down by 2.5% but they say âunderlying headlines earnings up 24%â, so itâs once again these confusing numbers.
Oh, Alec.Â
Surely there must be a way to clean all of this up so that itâs simple and you can understand it.
Iâm with you. Iâm an accountant. Iâm a Chartered Accountant, you know, and it confuses me because you want to look at the whole worth of the business and itâs very confusing. Even this Infra-16 is extremely confusing and Iâm saying, âWhy are you introducing these standards, which make things distorted?â If you want to know, ask Buffett. If you read his newsletter, it was all complaints and moans about mark to market and how itâs distorting the underlying value of his business. If thereâs anybody who knows how to value a business, itâs Mr. Buffett â the true value of the business. Heâs moaning and groaning, and complaining and saying, âIgnore all thatâ and I think for a person who doesnât understand accounting; reading these results is very difficult and if you feel confused, donât worry. Everybody else is confused as well.
But that doesnât fix it because youâre trying to help people to invest and to understand. You mentioned Warren Buffettâs annual letter. He also has been a vociferous opponent of EBITDA and Charlie Munger â whoâs 96 or 97 now â similarly and yet, I still see in the financial community, EBITDA is still⌠In a nutshell, what is EBITDA and why is Buffett so against it?
Itâs Earnings Before Interest, Tax and Amortisation. Those are real expenses. You canât ignore them. And thatâs what theyâre saying. Theyâre saying in the operation of a business, interest is a very important factor because if youâre overborrowed, interest is going to be high. What accountants and analysts are trying to look at, is the actual operational side. Theyâre saying, âLetâs look at the gross profit â your trading profit as being a true reflection of this.
So, if you had a pile of cash, you could go and buy this business with your cash and then you would make all the EBITDA so the cash-flow would come to you. But surely, youâre going to pay tax on it anyway, so why donât you factor the taxâŚ?
Tax is a very important factor as well and certainly depreciation is a massive factor. What is depreciation? Youâre allowed to write off your assets but they give you that write-off so you can replace it with cash, if you understand what Iâm saying. Youâre writing off a machine, but that said, itâs giving you the opening to put money aside to buy a new machine so theyâre saying âyes, machines are going to depreciateâ. Itâs a real cost, and if you havenât provided for that, youâre going to get caught because youâre going to buy a new machine, so I agree. I just think itâs absolute rubbish. To me accounting is an absolute fraud today.