🔒 Financial Times perspective: Switch to value stocks to prepare for inflation

by

The argument for rotating from Growth into Value stocks has been forwarded many times in the past decade. Anyone who followed it, however, would have made a mistake. But the time to switch may have finally arrived. As the FT’s excellent personal finance columnist Merryn Somerset Webb explains in the article below, there are now compelling reasons to disembark the Growth train. The graphic illustrating her piece (from our partners PrimeCharts) illustrates the point. It compares the long-term outperformance of Vanguard’s Growth ETF over the firm’s Value ETF. This gap has widened dramatically in the last two years. By Vanguard’s calculations, $10,000 invested in its Growth ETF a decade ago is today worth $58,500. The same investment into the Vanguard Growth ETF has grown to a more modest $37,280. In Rand terms that initial R82,000 investment in 2011 has ballooned to R875,000 in the Growth ETF compared with R558,000 in Value – an outperformance of 57%. Ms Webb argues the massive debt incurred by governments in response to the Covid-19 pandemic will soon need to be addressed. The consequence will result in the deadly combination of higher taxes and, worse, the old chestnut of inflating away the State debt mountain. Neither measures benefit Growth companies. From their perspective, it gets worse. – Alec Hogg

Use Spotify? Access BizNews podcasts here.

Use Apple Podcasts? Access BizNews podcasts here.
___STEADY_PAYWALL___

Switch to value stocks to prepare for inflation

While the UK government will raise taxes it will also use inflation to cut the weight of its huge debt

By Merryn Somerset Webb of The Financial Times

 OCTOBER 8 2021

The list of jobs I am pretty sure I would never volunteer for is long — though HGV driver is not as far down the list as it once was.

But close to the top is chancellor of the exchequer — now more than ever. Rishi Sunak has a horrible job. He needs to get the UK’s mad borrowing and spending levels under control.

But he also needs to find a way to finance our relentless demands — from net zero and healthcare to pothole-free roads — while making sure his hints of tax cuts to come are vaguely convincing.

So far none of this is going madly well. But it’s not quite as bad as it looks. As George Bull of RSM, an accountancy firm, points out, gross domestic product has rebounded smartly from last year — it was a mere 2.1 per cent below its pre-pandemic levels by the end of July.

Tax revenues will follow. That said, not quite as bad is not the same as not bad. It is bad.

The UK’s debt-to-GDP ratio is 106 per cent. A 2013 study from the World Bank suggests that once government debt goes over 77 per cent of GDP every additional percentage point reduces real annual GDP growth by 0.017 percentage points. At 106 per cent that adds up — its effect on living standards might be why Sunak said at his party’s conference this week that he considers the ongoing piling up of debt to be “immoral”.

All this suggests more taxation. But what sort? We already know that national insurance is to rise, supposedly to pay for social care. On top of that there are suggestions that council tax will have to increase even to keep essential services on the go.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies reckons on a 5 per cent rise by 2024/5. There are also expectations that the chancellor will soon set out views on reform (for which read increase) of capital gains tax (CGT). Meanwhile, the idea that the UK’s well-off should pay another wealth tax (CGT, inheritance tax and stamp duty are all wealth taxes) is not going away.

There are also probable new taxes on employment ahead. Lord Wolfson, chief executive of Next, suggested a simple solution to our labour shortage this week: business should be able to sponsor as many work visas as it likes — but pay a 7 per cent tax on wages for the right to do so. That idea makes some sense.

More subtle is the promised rise in the minimum wage. The UK state currently subsidises the wages of the low paid via the universal credit system — in July this year 5.9m people were claiming benefits this way. Put up the minimum wage and you effectively transfer the cost of much of that subsidy to companies.

That’s not a bad thing, as the state subsidising wages is odd. But the effect is the same as if, say, employers’ national insurance was raised (again).

There are various other tax changes that could help Sunak out a little: think pensions — put in what you can while you can.

But in the end political reality will mean that really big new taxes aren’t possible — the UK tax burden is already set to hit a 70-year high.

This means that the government is likely to end up relying on the oldest tax of all to erode the value of our debt relative to GDP — inflation. There is a lot of this about — and it looks less transitory by the day: a third of businesses in the UK say they are seeing the prices of materials, goods and services rise.

We’ve moved from the explanation for this being the base effect (the oil price moving from around zero in March 2021 to $75 a barrel today for example) to it being all about short-term supply crunches.

Both are perfectly reasonable explanations: after all, once we have been through a period of adjustment it makes sense for things that were plentiful two years ago to be plentiful again. But what if there is another inflation wave to come on top of these two? Wages could keep rising perhaps — pay demands are contagious.

But there is also a demand boom hiding in plain sight. The quantitative easing that followed the Global Financial Crisis didn’t lead to consumer inflation for the simple reason that it was mostly offset by banks repairing their balance sheets, so they weren’t lending much.

But this time around we have seen record-breaking surges in broad money supply: worldwide bank deposits rose 11.9 per cent in 2020. As caution recedes, that money will probably be spent — and prices will rise. That may of course be a transitory effect as well — but too many transitory effects in a row and we will have to change the definition of the word transitory.

The inflation tax is one of the toughest for investors to deal with. It enhances the wealth tax elements of IHT and CGT — even if you make no real gains, you are still taxed on your nominal gains, something that obviously reduces real wealth.

But it also hits bond markets hard — a huge worry for older people who have been “lifestyled” into seemingly low-risk bonds funds. UK gilt yields are at their highest since mid-2019 and 10-year Treasury yields are up too (prices go down when yields go up).

Worse for the complacent, it could have a nasty effect on the growth stocks that have been driving global markets — note that the US Nasdaq tech stock index is down about 6 per cent in the last four weeks.

That’s a problem given that most equity investors seem to prefer growth stocks to anything hinting at value.

This week the eToro trading group reported that nine of the 10 top stocks held on its platform are growth stocks — Tesla and Nio being the top two. Meanwhile, funds network group Calastone said that September was the second worst month on record for UK equity funds in terms of flows, after June 2020 — when everything was being sold down.

While pretty much every other geographical region saw money flowing in, the UK saw a net £567m leave. If inflation gets to and sticks at, say, 4 per cent, the prices of growth stocks will surely tank — you will want a 4 per cent earnings yield to compensate for the inflation, something that suggests you won’t want to pay a price/earnings ratio of much more than 20-25 times for any equities. The p/e of the S&P 500 is currently 30 times. That of the FTSE 100 is more like 15 times.

That rather suggests that if you want to avoid the worst of the inflation effect it’s time to shift from growth to value, something the clever private equity industry is already doing. There’s a reason buyout groups have paid an average premium of 47 per cent over the prevailing share price for UK companies this year.

Read more:

Visited 211 times, 1 visit(s) today

BizNews