There is no rationality in the government's decision over which countries are allowed to travel to South Africa under lockdown level 1.
This is according to the Association of South African Travel Agents (ASATA), which told Rapport it makes no sense that travellers from any African countries are permitted, while many low-risk European countries are prohibited.
These comments follow Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Naledi Pandor announcing on Wednesday that international flights would resume to a number of countries around the world from 1 October.
To determine which travellers may visit South Africa, the government divided countries into three risk groups based on their relation to South Africa's risk level – high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk.
Under the current regulations, leisure travel from high-risk countries is not allowed. The exception will be business travellers with scarce and critical skills including diplomats, repatriated persons, investors, and people participating in professional sporting events.
Use of WHO criteria
During the announcement, Pandor noted the government looked at WHO criteria to assess the risk of countries when determining the whitelist for international travel.
According to the organisation's guidelines, countries that have more than 20 active cases per 100,000 people are regarded as high-risk.
However, South Africa's high-risk list includes countries like Armenia, which has had only 13 active cases per 100,000 people over the last two weeks.
Rapport noted there were several other prohibited countries which also fell into this category, including Georgia, Guatemala, Jamaica, and the Maldives.
Meanwhile, leisure travel from Morocco is allowed, despite the country currently having 85 active cases per 100,000.
Also listen: Prof Alan Whiteside: Covid-19's sad reality as politics takes centre stage with Dr Gray, Cummings, Bolsonaro