Key topics:
- Ramaphosa proposes VAT hike to resolve a Government of National Unity dispute.
- DA opposes VAT increase, suggesting budget cuts to fund public services instead.
- Sars argues better tax compliance could raise R60 billion without tax hikes.
Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.
Support South Africaâs bastion of independent journalism, offering balanced insights on investments, business, and the political economy, by joining BizNews Premium. Register here.
If you prefer WhatsApp for updates, sign up to the BizNews channel here.
By Hanno Labuschagne
President Cyril Ramaphosa has proposed hiking value-added tax (VAT) by between 0.5 and one percentage point in the countryâs 2025/2026 budget to resolve a dispute in the Government of National Unity (GNU).
City Press reported that government sources said the compromise was tabled during a Cabinet meeting last week.
Finance minister Enoch Godongwanaâs original budget, which he planned to announce on 19 February 2025, included an increase in the VAT rate by two percentage points â from 15% to 17%.
Godongwana explained this would be necessary to fund public sector wage increases, retain essential frontline workers, invest in a commuter rail system to better serve working-class families, and support above-inflation increases to social grants.
Godongwana said government had thoroughly examined alternatives to raising the VAT rate, including increases to corporate and personal income taxes.
âHowever, these would generate substantially less revenue while potentially harming economic growth and job creation,â his undelivered budget speech stated.
The Democratic Alliance, the second-biggest party in the government of national unity, threatened to vote against the budget when it was tabled in Parliament.
Citing its sources, Rapport reported that the ANC-led government continued with the VAT plan despite weeks of indications from the DA that they would not support it.
Ramaphosaâs proposal came after finance minister Enoch Godongwana explained the ramifications of not increasing VAT, which he warned would include scrapping the lockdown-era R350 per month Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant.
The government budgeted R35.2 billion to extend the SRD grant for another year, a promise that formed a key part of the ANCâs 2024 election campaign.
The DA is not opposed to keeping the grant but has proposed it be converted into a Job Seekersâ Allowance for those actively searching for work.
The party maintains that South Africaâs tax base is too small to support further tax hikes without strangling private sector investments and causing further damage to the economy.
Instead of tax increases, it has proposed several measures to cut expenditures that would result in savings equal to the extra R60 billion that the government had estimated would be raised through the VAT increase.
These proposed cuts include:
- A 50% reduction in government advertising budgets
- A 33% reduction in travel and catering expenditure for government officials
- A hiring freeze for all non-essential government employees
- An audit of government employees to identify so-called âghostâ workers
The DA also wants a three-month spending review to identify wasteful and failing programmes to enable the reallocation of funds.
These funds would go to essential public services and the ability to pay for legally-mandated commitments like wage increases.
Donât increase taxes, increase tax collection
The DA has also supported a South African Revenue Service (Sars) proposal that government provide the taxman with more funding to upgrade its systems and increase tax compliance.
âIncreasing tax compliance from 63% to 67% can generate R60 billion per year,â the DA said.
Sars commissioner Edward Kieswetter has repeatedly appealed for additional funding to improve the agencyâs tax collection capabilities.
The entity has estimated that tax dodging costs the country around R800 billion annually.
Sars modelling predicted that it could collect R450 billion to R460 billion extra if it received funding to modernise its systems.
Kieswetter has explained that Sars will need continuous funding for the agencyâs digitalisation to keep up with tax crime.
âOnce you suspend funding, the end result will always be the suspension of innovation and regression against the progress of other administrations,â Kieswetter said.
In his original budget speech, Godongwana said that R3.5 billion would be allocated to the agency to modernise its ICT systems to enhance revenue collection and improve tax compliance âwell into the future.â
However, it is unclear how much funding Sars wanted to improve its tax compliance rate sufficiently to ward off further tax increases.
Read also
