Chinese regulatory bodies are frightening even the most bullish – With insights from The Wall Street Journal

Chinese tech companies have fallen from grace over the past week, with its regulatory bodies frightening even the most bullish on the world’s second largest economy. Naspers and Prosus crown jewel Tencent has been one of the worst affected with its shares tumbling around 45% from its highs in mid-February and nearly 20% this week alone. As our partners at the Wall Street Journal unpack below, the Chinese regulatory authorities are notoriously unfair and have far greater control than regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions. Many, including Morgan Stanley’s ex-chief economist and chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia Stephen Roach has been extremely optimistic on China and its growth prospects for over 25 years. The veteran economist has become bearish with the amount of uncertainty in the air (Stephen Roach CNBC interview attached for ease of reference). Worrying times for many, including the lion’s share of South African savers and investors, who have profited for many years from Tencent’s incredible growth through the Naspers stable lopsided weighting on all local indexes – which may come to a grinding halt. – Justin R0we-Roberts

Beijing Gives Tech Investors a Brutal New Tutorial

The pain for Chinese internet technology firms will be long-lasting—and the crackdown isn’t over yet.

Updated July 27, 2021 5:26 am ET

Anyone who bought into Chinese internet stocks hoping for a bounce following the dramatic fall from grace of ride-hailing giant Didi has been taught another painful lesson this week. Fighting the Fed, or Washington, is usually a losing game—but betting against Beijing’s fast-moving, often opaque regulatory apparatus in Xi Jinping’s new era of centralised control is suicidal.

Chinese tech stocks already punished by a widening antitrust and data-security crackdown have lost billions of dollars in market value over the past few days as a new selloff hit almost every single company in the sector. The immediate trigger: new rules that would basically wipe out much of the booming after-school tutoring sector. While tightening regulations have long been on the horizon, the scope and severity of the crackdown still caught investors by surprise. Goldman Sachs has cut its market-size forecast for after-school tutoring in 2025 by 85%. Shares of New Oriental Education have lost 70% since Friday, when the news was first leaked.

The industry is a big customer of online advertising, but that isn’t the cause of the wider tech selloff. Instead, investors are reassessing regulatory risk for Chinese equities more broadly. Crackdowns like the one on tutoring likely won’t extend to most other sectors, but Beijing has sent a clear message nonetheless. Enormous pain for investors—particularly those of the offshore variety—isn’t a barrier to policy goals. And when such crackdowns unfold, they often go further and faster than nearly anyone initially expects.

The crackdown is consistent with China’s aim of reducing child-rearing costs as the population ages. But cracking the whip on tutoring firms does little to address the fundamental forces driving demand for their services: brutal competition for places in elite colleges and for scarce good jobs after graduation.

The regulatory assault on big tech is far from over. Regulators also issued new guidelines asking food-delivery companies to ensure workers are paid at least the minimum wage. Delivery giant Meituan’s shares have slid 25% in the past couple of days. China’s tech regulator also ordered firms to fix anticompetitive practices like “malicious blocking of website links” on Monday—that likely means platforms like Alibaba’s Taobao and Tencent’s WeChat will need to accept their rivals’ links and payment systems inside their previously walled gardens.

Like other countries in the world, China is grappling with the far-reaching impact of big tech on competition, consumers and workers. The country’s opaque authoritarian system allows swift and forceful action, but that also means investors face greater uncertainty—and very little recourse when policy winds blow against them. Instead of trying to argue their case in courts or the media, Chinese tech companies often thank regulators after being punished.

Regulatory risks are notoriously difficult to quantify everywhere and shouting down angry politicians is always a dangerous game. In China, companies now know better than to try and investors should recognise that there is little they can do other than get out of the way.