I was very excited when I received notification of ownership of Old Mutual shares back in the late 1990s when the life assurer demutualised. Like other policyholders, I was allocated stock in the listed entity. Year in and year out, I had to keep records of small dividend payouts on my tax return. Then, when I decided to sell the shares, I found it agonisingly time-consuming to try to work through an entangled web of bureaucracy. Although I could receive dividend payments in my bank account, I was unable to provide sufficient documentation to convince the organisation to release the actual shares to me. In the end, I gave up and asked the share registry to donate my shares to charity. Although it wouldn’t give the shares to me, it allegedly passed the shares on to another party, albeit a charity, with relative ease. For all I know, the shares haven’t gone anywhere. And, so, I’m not surprised to see that companies like Old Mutual are sitting on a mountain of unclaimed pension fund money. I can only imagine there are many people like me who grow fatigued with trying to pierce the armour around pension fund providers, which have an interest in keeping this large pot of money to themselves. The Daily Maverick’s Ruan Jooste picks up on South Africa’s retirement rogues. Her article is published on BizNews with permission. – Jackie Cameron
Retirement rogues and the casualties of circumstance
By Ruan Jooste
There are multiple reasons for there being an estimated total of R42-billion in benefits owed to more than four million pensioners and pension fund members, according to the Financial Services Conduct Authority (FSCA) 2018 Annual Report.
According to a report, “The Bottom Line, Who Profits From Unpaid Pensions?” released by advocacy group Open Secrets on Wednesday 30 October 2019, private fund administrators and the regulators have failed collectively to build transparent and accountable structures for the management of these funds.
“Instead, a system of perverse incentives flourishes,” it says. “Administrators derive considerable income and profit from fees related to managing assets.”
The FSCA concurs, saying in its annual report that if liabilities for unclaimed benefits, and assets of equivalent value, are transferred to an unclaimed benefit fund over which the administrator has effective control, it may be able to ensure that service providers related to it, such as asset managers, derive significant income from managing these funds.
It is also a case of these funds retaining those assets rather than disposing of them and making an effort to trace beneficiaries and make payment to them.
The disparity in perception about what is at stake here, the Open Secrets report states, is for each side. While R10,000 could be a life-changing windfall for a poor South African pensioner or dependant, it is a small change in the world of the private fund administrator.
“There are serious socio-economic consequences of depriving ordinary people of their retirement benefits, the report states.” Pensioners interviewed for the report include mine workers and factory workers.
“They have been unsuccessfully trying to seek payment of their own benefits or that owed to a family member who has since died,” it says.
Of course, poorer communities and vulnerable family constructs are most at risk. But the problem has no demographic bias.
Read also: State Pension guardians asleep at the wheel – angry pensioners
Two of my very close friends, both financially savvy and active in the financial sector, are entangled in this mess. The one can’t find the owners or administrators of the two stand-alone funds single bonds he contributed to when he was a rookie.
The other wasn’t aware he was entitled to surplus distributions linked to funds with his previous employers.
Rosemary Hunter, a partner at Bell Dewar, says the number is actually higher, as the FSB report deals only with funds under its jurisdiction — the government employees pension fund is not included.
Hunter was the first person to blow the whistle, after she’d been appointed as FSB deputy registrar in 2013.
If you add up the other funds, it’s about R51-billion now and it’s growing.
It’s a long, long story. It’s not all because of these cancelled pension funds, these deregistered pension funds, but that certainly exacerbated the problem.
Hunter explains some of the multitude of reasons behind this dire situation. These include funds that don’t actively follow up on members, people who simply don’t know how to claim when they stop working and family members who are uninformed about what to do when a fund member dies.
A pension fund is separate from an employer, so if the employer goes under they don’t realise that actually, their pension fund is alive and well and their money is probably safe there.
Funders also seem to be passive — they don’t find and pay people. If the contributions stop they should figure out that the person has stopped working, maybe, and they should make inquiries. A lot of people just don’t know how to claim.
Hunter explains that preceding the large-scale deregistration of pension funds, there had been a trend for smaller employers to move their employees into umbrella funds.
Quite often, the original funds were just abandoned and no one followed up.
In addition, the Registrar does not maintain the records of individual members. She maintains the records of retirement funds and retirement fund administrators and therefore assists with facilitating your inquiry with the relevant retirement fund or retirement fund administrator.
While admitting that the issue is “hugely complex”, Michael Marchant, who headed the research team, says:
“We want the public to understand the scale of the problem in the industry.”
Open Secrets puts the blame at the door of a failed cancellation project by the FSCA and its impact on the lives of the beneficiaries left unable to access their pensions. The nonprofit aims to put pressure on authorities to hold accountable those who wrongly deregistered a large number of pension funds.
Between 2007 and 2013, the Financial Services Board (FSB), now the Financial Services Conduct Authority (FSCA), began a “cancellations project” to de-register 6,757 stand-alone corporate pension funds, by closing down dormant “shell funds”, consolidating smaller costly funds into umbrella structures. The industry wanted it and the regulator wanted to get its house in better order. A win-win.
There is significant evidence to suggest that both the state regulator (the FSB) and private fund administrators cut corners and ignored the law to de-register as many funds as possible in the shortest time.
How much more orphan money is out there? Not even the FSCA knows. They still have not released all their internal investigations into how beneficiaries may have been harmed by the cancellations. This is what we do know: KPMG was asked by the FSB to analyse 510 of the cancelled funds in 2014. It concluded that the Registrar of Pension Funds did not have the information required — including whether the funds still had assets — to reasonably order 500 of these 510 cancellations.
They estimated a “high likelihood” of up to R2.5-billion in remaining assets and liabilities in 500 of the funds they reviewed. Even when the benefits owed are in the thousands, and might be considered by big corporations to be a small amount of money, many are dependents who rely on the pension of a deceased breadwinner that is owed to them. Delays and failures to pay these benefits have a serious impact on financially vulnerable people.
Liberty Corporate executive Tiaan Kotze says Liberty acknowledges that the matter of unclaimed benefits is a significant industry issue and “we take it very seriously”. The company has been identified as one of the major perpetrators.
The unclaimed benefits in funds administered by Liberty account for R2-billion of the R42-billion of unclaimed benefits across the industry.
“We are fully committed to paying the benefits to members of these funds and are investing significant resources into enhancing our tracing and payment capabilities. Liberty supports ongoing industry and stakeholder collaboration to address this important issue,” says Kotze.
The other company pointed out in various reports was Alexander Forbes, which did not get back to Business Maverick on the matter. BM
