Despite South Africa’s claims of non-alignment and neutrality, its membership in the Brics alliance raises concerns. Nicholas Woode-Smith highlights how South Africa’s foreign policy choices could jeopardise jobs and opportunities. With trade imbalances and questionable benefits, Woode-Smith questions why South Africa aligns with Brics, emphasising the need for true global neutrality and improved relations with profitable trade partners. He also warns against Brics’ ambitions to shift away from the US dollar in global trade, urging South Africa to prioritise its interests wisely in a world marked by conflict and power rivalry.
Sign up for your early morning brew of the BizNews Insider to keep you up to speed with the content that matters. The newsletter will land in your inbox at 5:30am weekdays. Register here.
South Africa Flippant on Neutrality
By Nicholas Woode-Smith*
Despite repeatedly claiming that South Africa is committed to non-alignment and neutrality, the government has consistently made it very clear that it wants to choose sides; something it really should not be doing.
Its track record of terrible decision-making with regards to foreign affairs could lose South Africans countless jobs and opportunities, as we risk losing access to preferential trade agreements with the United States when AGOA (the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act) expires and isnât renewed.
Rather than reinforcing ties with Brics, giving aid to Russia, or buddying up to China, South Africa should be committed to true global neutrality, and stop supporting blatant attempts to divide the world between East and West.
Why are we in Brics?
Ahead of the 15th Brics summit, President Cyril Ramaphosa made assurances that South Africa would not be drawn into a contest between global powers. But our foreign policy and actions have said otherwise.
But what is Brics but an alliance of foreign powers closing ranks to oppose a competing global power? Brics is not an innocent trade bloc. It is an instrument of the economic will of its largest members.
China has used Brics to penetrate foreign markets, causing massive trade imbalances and influencing local politics through bribery and petty display of foreign aid that do little to actually assuage local crises.
Russia has used Brics to remain economically relevant despite facing sanctions and a collapsing economy due to an ill-advised war of conquest.
India and Brazil have no real business being in Brics. They are large economies with sought after trade goods and large workforces that could elevate both of them to prosperity if the right policies are followed.
That leaves South Africa. Why are we in Brics? None of our most profitable trade partners are in Brics. China and India appear to be some of our largest trade partners, but only because we import many goods from them.
We lose more money trading with China and India than we gain. This is not to say that trading with these two countries is a bad thing and that we should cut off trade with them. Definitely not. We need imported goods. Otherwise, we wouldnât purchase them. But, shouldnât we be focusing on improving relations with profitable trade partners?
As of this year, South Africa recorded a trade deficit of $14.9billion from its trade with Brics partners. Conversely, in 2023, South Africaâs balance of trade with the United States was $991million in our favour. This is not to mention our other profitable trade partners in Europe.
We profit from trade with the West. Yet, we are closing ranks and forming a trade block with nations which donât want our goods and just want to sell their imported goods to us.
Read more: Nicholas Woode-Smith: The ANCâs deliberate failures â South Africaâs path to collapse
Brics is Not Neutral
Brics is not an innocent, neutral power. It contains two major global powers that have vocally put themselves in competition with the United States and its allies.
On top of this, Brics is attempting to move away from the use of the US dollar in global trade â either through facilitating trade through local currencies, or by creating a single Brics currency. Both ideas are foolish.
Using local currencies will become a costly and inconvenient affair. Single currencies being used between many economic agents just makes trade simpler. The use of the US dollar for global trade helps all nations in the same way that a single currency helps facilitate trade within a country.
Additionally, the cost and danger of a Brics currency should not be underestimated. One country will inevitably dominate this currency. And while the proliferation of the US dollar reduces the risk of dominance through its currency, this will not be the same with a fledgling currency. And even if this doesnât happen, why invest so much money in what amounts to a vanity project when we can just leverage the US dollar? Most of the world uses it. We use it. Donât waste time and money changing things that donât need to be changed.
Read more: BRICS expansion: African nations at crossroads between committing allegiance to USA or China
South Africa is Not Neutral
South Africaâs membership in Brics doesnât make sense, as argued above. But even without our allegiance to Brics, South Africaâs behaviour has revealed that weâre anything but neutral. From conducting military exercises with, and possibly even sending weapons to, Russia, to our abysmal UN voting record â it is clear that South Africa is playing its own Cold War where the Soviets and United States are still at each otherâs throats.
Rather than embracing pragmatic foreign policy and free trade, South Africa would rather back foreign powers that give us nothing but petty bribes.
True neutrality would be to abandon allegiances to these hostile powers, and rather open trade relations with everyone.
But, on the other hand, neutrality may actually be a foolish notion. Neutrality is a misnomer in a world full of conflict. Rather than paying lip service to neutrality while siding with the wrong partners, South Africa should be doing what is best for it â and siding with our profitable trade partners and the nations that reflect our values. Something we are not doing now.
The Brics summit will end, and South Africa will have ingratiated itself ever more with sycophants and manipulators. And we will all be the worse for it. Letâs just hope that the United States takes pity on us and keeps us in Agoa. I must admit, we donât deserve it.
Read also:
- Nicholas Woode-Smith on the EFFâs dangerous influence: A threat to South African politics
- âLike it or not, the DA will lead the opposition,â â Nicholas Woode-Smith on the fallacy of equality in coalitions
- Opposition parties, get your acts together â Nicholas Woode-Smith
*Nicholas Woode-Smith, an author, economic historian, and political analyst, is a contributing author for the Free Market Foundation. The views expressed in the article are the authorâs and not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.
