"'The exodus of the rich and the skilled should serve as the first warning sign of a country heading towards collapse.' Unfortunately South Africa is 'governed' by a collective too stupid to recognise this," says Andre Louw.
Of the protests in Senekal, Nicole Stuart says:
"The Senekal protests are much more than white farmers protesting about a targeted campaign of eradication. It is a statement that the pressure is building in South African society, with thinkers of all races coming to the conclusion that democracy will not solve the problems that have been caused by the ANC. The cauldron is heating, much more rapidly every day, and soon will boil over. Ramaphosa and his inadequate dreams for the country, conceived without an understanding of what the people – all of them – and the country need, will not defuse this explosive mix. The State does not have the power to damp the flames of revolution, and it appears likely that the situation will soon get out of control if that point is not already here.
The only solution to the problems is for the ANC to gain a realistic appreciation of what has gone wrong, and why, and then to start correcting those problems. This is not rocket science – you need only read the comments to articles such as this – but it will be painful for Ramaphosa and his cohorts in the ANC, who conceived the master plan prior to 1994, and then proceeded to loot the Whites, spreading their tentacles to all citizens, with no aim other than to enrich themselves, regardless of the effects to the country. The day of reckoning seems to be not far away, and the ineffectual flailing of Ramaphosa and his like-minded 'advisors', hoping to make a change without changing anything of importance, will not put it off for much longer. One can only hope, probably in vain, that the revelations of the Zondo Commission will result in real change, before the angry multitude decide to storm the Bastille."
Read also: Budget 2020: South African expat tax exemption increase and no more financial emigration
There are also those who disagree with Van Heerden's points.